国名を選択して下さい: |
![]() |
USA |
Thanks, but I could still technically finish 2nd (or even 3rd). I know I play a manager-less team on Sunday, but stranger things have happened...
If you lose to the Dead Pooks than you have to forfeit your team.
Congrats.
Again
This is getting boring. Let someone else win.
Congrats.
Again
This is getting boring. Let someone else win.
How you guys follow players training routine without a pro pack? 1st day without it, and i already have a headache.

Don't worry too much about hitting specific ratios all the time. And no training will ever be wasted as long as you're training the right attributes for each position. You really only need to check training carefully every few days.
I setup my own spreadsheet and keep and eye on the ratios there.
Thanks.
Again.
Good luck to everyone next season, perhaps it'll be as exciting as this one.
Again.
Good luck to everyone next season, perhaps it'll be as exciting as this one.
Man, you guys just couldn't let FC Corona finish top 2 for me, could ya?
Grats to the Boilermakers, and come on Arlington Betamax, you can win the CWC!

Looks like I'll get to join the big boys next season, and hopefully a few more after that at least.
Well, I had to try to secure some international play for next year in case I lose on Wednesday! But don't worry. I'm still going all-out for the CWC championship as well. I'll do my best to get you in there.
Although really it's pretty absurd that only one "rest of the world" country gets 6 teams in international play. In Europe, 17 countries get six teams (although they start their tournaments with a qualification round). In South America, every country gets 8 teams except one, which gets 6. But in the "rest of the world" only one country has 6 teams?
It's silly for the competitiveness, too. In Europe's CWC group play, no team gave up 20 or more goals and only two teams took 0 points. In the "Rest of the World" CWC, which is half the size of Europe's, 6 teams took 0 points and two teams gave up 30 or more goals. Take more teams from the top countries and it would be a much more competitive tournament.
Although really it's pretty absurd that only one "rest of the world" country gets 6 teams in international play. In Europe, 17 countries get six teams (although they start their tournaments with a qualification round). In South America, every country gets 8 teams except one, which gets 6. But in the "rest of the world" only one country has 6 teams?
It's silly for the competitiveness, too. In Europe's CWC group play, no team gave up 20 or more goals and only two teams took 0 points. In the "Rest of the World" CWC, which is half the size of Europe's, 6 teams took 0 points and two teams gave up 30 or more goals. Take more teams from the top countries and it would be a much more competitive tournament.
I thought the same thing on my initial read-through. However, I don't think it'll have a very big impact on prices overall. Most bids that people currently place will still be allowed in the new system. In other cases, once a player's bid reaches a certain level, there's essentially no difference between the current system and the future system.
I think that the financial changes will have a bigger impact of market prices than the market changes. Although, we're not aware of the extent of the financial changes quite yet.
I think that the financial changes will have a bigger impact of market prices than the market changes. Although, we're not aware of the extent of the financial changes quite yet.
お気に入りのスレッド
最新の投稿