Onderwerp: Suggestions

I suggest that we rename the "cuptournament" into "the knockout tournament we play on tuesdays". It may be less catchy, but it is highly more accurate, since I didn't actually get a cup in my trophy cabinet for winning the so called cup!

You will get it later. Until the 4th season, I think. Here's a team who won it in 2nd season:

hockey.powerplaymanager.c...

If this truly is the case this needs to be changed. I asked if TV deals are based on current arena capacity or current + future and I was told current.

Unfortunately I didn't think about it until after I had already knocked down half my arena.

If this is the case, I think it is completely wrong to be punished for an entire years worth of a TV deal because I chose to build this week as opposed to last week or next week.

If it could be based on my arena before upgrades, that would be fair. After upgrades, even better, but based on just over half the seating I ran all season is just wrong

As someone who has 2 stands inactive due to multi-functions being built, i absolutely 100% agree!

thirded. I'm not in construction, but thats just busted unless your construction will eat into a large portion of the season's revenue. Certainly it should have some negative effect, but not entirely ignored.

I do think this needs to be raised with PPM admin, as it's a major issue!

well in my case its just 10 days on 3 parts, 5 days on the other, but my capacity went from 1700 to 900 temporarily.

and I agree TB.

I have just sent an email to both Ivan (tuttle) and Vlady explaining the situation and asked for an official word on it. I'll update when they get back to me.

Personally, if these deals are based on our current capacity... there is going to be some extremely upset people, and upset people are not what PPM need.

i appreciate that. I never got an official word though brother is usually reliable, thats why i qualified what i said with "if this is the case"

Also, I figured after I told someone else that complaining in the Q&A thread does no good, that making a suggestion in the suggestion thread was the way to go, I figured I should follow my own advice

Yep

I guess we'll find out in the next few hours.

I suggest the final youth pull of the season be moved to beginning of the next season. That way we don't have them get aged immediately. And because there is a delay, perhaps a small OR bump for the delay.... Just a thought.

Easily fixed, just don't view the players until the new season starts and they wont age.

but like you said in the other thread its a programming error in that they lose a year, but thats true of the pull from two weeks ago as well, but... I'd like a delay so that mistake isn't made is all.

In all fairness I think they should fix it so the age is determined when they first become available. I doubt they will but it is how it should be. I love having them as 15 for the new season but it is an exploit of a programming flaw.

It's not a flaw the ones from 2 weeks ago will age for the new season. They're no different from any others generated this season.