Tijd:

Je ploegen:
Communicatie
Public account
  PRO Zone
1330 credits
Credits kopen
Je bent op een publieke account. Als je het spel wil spelen of wil meedoen met de discussie moet je inloggen. Als je een nieuwe gebruiker bent, moet je je eerst registreren.

  Onderwerp: Questions & Answers


Ciukitu

Is a known issue my friend ! :D
Anyway, you can check it in guide too:

Shooting: The shooting attribute is important for all the players, except the goalie, to score goals. The higher the shooting attribute, the higher the possibility that the player will capitalize on his scoring chance. Defensemen with good shooting tend to score more goals from the point.
(nothing about number of shots)

Offence: ...bla bla ... It represents the ability of players to create a scoring chance and it also represents the ratio of how often the player will shoot in a good scoring chance. Players with lower offence attribute often choose to pass even if they should rather take a shot. ..bla bla...

Defence: This attribute is used by all the players to stop the opponents from scoring by not letting them create scoring chances.


Popeчe


Issue that I forgot :)
Thanks Ciukity !


Ciukitu


It's Ciukitu !
Apologizes not needed :D !


Popeчe


Slip my hand while writing :P


legionnaire11

I've got 4 goalies on my roster. Wondering which 2 I should keep, and which 1 of them should be considered my top goalie... I scouted all 4, will display as attribute(Quality)...

Goalie A: Age 19, 5/6, Goal: 101(83), Pass: 40(50), Tech: 37(34)

Goalie B: Age 19, 4/6, Goal: 90(75), Pass: 33(37), Tech: 45(49)

Goalie C: Age 20, 5/6, Goal: 72(58), Pass: 28(67), Tech: 29(51)

Goalie D: Age 15, 5/6, Goal: 69(62), Pass: 36(54), Tech: 42(74)


reverist

Keep C and D, in my opinion. A's "extra" goal stat really means he's only a 74 if I understand the principle correctly (and his secondary attys can't keep up). B's tech and pass qualities are too low, and I don't know how effective his goal can be with such low passing. C is unbalanced but has decent qualities, and it won't take much to lift him to a 2:1:1 ratio. D is only 15 and has the same C/L, with room to grow his attributes and good qualities. Get his pass to 42 and his goal to 84 and boom. There's your starter. Of course, that's just my opinion.


kamdog92


I'd have to agree but hold off on getting rid of a and b till you get c and d trained up.

At the end there you sounded a little like John Madden


jimrtex


A is your #1 for now, though it is going to be a pain keeping his passing and tech up. B has the same problem plus his CL has dropped. I'd maybe train his Goal up to 100 and sell him.

C and D are about the same, except D's age means he is less likely to have a CL drop. I'd be getting experience for C and D in friendlies.

And keep the eye out for E.


reverist


LOL awesome yeah I did sound like Madden there didn't I? "Boom."


Popeчe

A- 250
B- 236
C- 234
D- 252
This means that A and D are your best choices as far training is concerned. So, I would take A and D.


zomg


If you subscribe to the common belief that keeping a player's attributes within a specific ratio is optimum for success, then using a bit of math to answer this type of question is quite helpful. Step 1 is figuring out who should be playing right now. For this we want to use something I call the Effective Overall Rating (EOR) which is the total of the important stats for a given position modified by the desired attribute ratio. It's calculated as MINIMUM ( Attribute 1 / Ratio 1, Attribute 2 / Ratio 2, ...) * (Ratio 1 + Ratio 2 + ...). So if you want your goalies to be trained as a 2:1:1, then player A's EOR is MIN (101/2 , 40/1 , 37/1) * (2+1+1) -> MIN(50.5,40,37)*4 -> 37*4 = 148. Doing the same thing for the remaining 3 players gives us A(148), B(132), C(112), D(136), therefore I would use A for now and have D as backup.

Step 2 is figuring out who has a future on the team and who should be released. For this I calculate the Effective Quality (EQ) as described in this wonderful article: glanvalleyeaglets.wordpr ... . The EQ is essentially the weighted harmonic mean of the player's important qualities and is a true measure of their rate of advancement where a simple average is not. Something the article doesn't mention but is very important is to adjust the EQ based on the player's CL. In a post somewhere on the forums, the manager Stan reported that at CL 5/6, a player trains 10% slower then he would at 6/6, and at 4/6 it's a 20% reduction. Thus the EQ's for each player (as modified by their CL) are A(48.97), B(43.18), C(52.16), D(56.00). What this tells us is that D will advance the fastest and B the slowest - at least until the end of the season when some players may drop in CL and thus some recalculations may need to be done.

So let's list out each player by EOR and EQ for comparison:

A - 148 - 48.97
B - 132 - 43.18
C - 112 - 52.16
D - 136 - 56.00

A should be the starter though he will eventually be passed up. D should be our backup, but will move to starter before too long, especially considering his age should keep his CL high for a few seasons. C could possibly become a backup someday since his EQ is higher than A's, but he will never be a starter. Both his EOR and his EQ are lower than D, so he will never catch up (barring some extreme injuries to D). B has no future on the team. His current EOR is too low to play, and his EQ is too low to allow him to ever catch up to the others - he will only fall farther behind with time. So get rid of B, and if you really only want 2 goalies on the team, then C would be the next in line for a pink slip, though you should probably keep him around till he passes A, and then you could send A packing.

Something to note is that comparing players by EQ assumes you're going to keep them fairly close to a perfect attribute ratio. For example A is going to train slower then his EQ would seem to indicate since he would have to train in his two lowest qualities for quite awhile to get back into the desired ratio, assuming you want to train him to a 2:1:1.


zomg

Hmm I broke the link so let's try again: glanvalleyeaglets.wordpre...


Popeчe


How did you calculated their quality ?


trueblue55


Legionare mentioned the qualities in a post further up.


Popeчe


Yes, I've used them to list goalies by training in my example (first x2 + 2 secondaries). I don't know what zomg did there.



Je favoriete onderwerpen
Italië I.1
Slowakije I.1
Bosnië-Herzegovina koga bi vi
Bosnië-Herzegovina Veliki događa...
Bosnië-Herzegovina Sastanak BH Z...
Oostenrijk Tennis Duel -...
België financien
België Vanalles
Azerbeidzjan PPM Translato...
Oostenrijk Facebook
Bosnië-Herzegovina Facebook
Oostenrijk 2. Mannschaft...
Oostenrijk Jerseys?
Azerbeidzjan U-17 milli ko...
Bosnië-Herzegovina Sms krediti
Slowakije Kohutko Cup I...
Slowakije Gold Cup
Slowakije National Gree...
Slowakije V.168
Slowakije players for G...
Slowakije Pravidla (Ad ...
Slowakije 2 zapasy za d...
Slowakije Ligový pohár
Slowakije dresy a vlajk...
Slowakije National Germ...
Slowakije Voľby trénera...
Slowakije DB National I...
Slowakije PPZT:pred a p...
Slowakije F1
Slowakije tranfers
Australië New F1 manage...
Slowakije organizujem t...
Slowakije transfer
Slowakije Dresy
Slowakije VI.188
Slowakije VI.190
Slowakije VI.196
Slowakije VI.185
Slowakije VI.184
Slowakije VI.180
Slowakije VI.166
Slowakije VI.172
Slowakije VI.168
Slowakije VI.169
Slowakije VI.170
Slowakije VI.173
Slowakije VI.164
Slowakije VI.163
Slowakije VI.127
Slowakije V.85
Slowakije VI.111
Slowakije VI.72
Slowakije VI.109
Slowakije Futbalová Rep...
Slowakije V.253
Slowakije Slovakia Cup ...
Slowakije VI.113
Slowakije Esox lucius f...
Slowakije trgu - trensf...
Slowakije V.160
Slowakije Klubové vlajk...
Slowakije Vytvorenie kl...
Slowakije V.248
Slowakije VI.143
Slowakije VI.146
Slowakije V.170
Slowakije V.232
Slowakije Žilinska fotb...
Slowakije V.252
Slowakije V.255
Slowakije V.247
Slowakije VI.96
Slowakije V.223
Slowakije VI.9
Slowakije Kto ma najvac...
Slowakije V.230
Slowakije V.133
Slowakije VI.147
Slowakije V.184
Slowakije uspesnost str...
Slowakije VI.126
Slowakije VI.58
Slowakije VI.51
Wit-Rusland "Клубная супе...
Slowakije V.158 tipovač...
Slowakije V.250
Slowakije VI.80
Slowakije mini champion...
Slowakije V.249
Slowakije V.229
Slowakije V.251
Slowakije Primera Divis...
Slowakije Tímový web
Slowakije VI.160
Slowakije Friendly Matc...
Slowakije VI.156
Slowakije Klubovy web
Slowakije V.127
Slowakije Futbalova Rep...
Slowakije Taktiky
Slowakije Tréning hráčo...
Slowakije SVK Repre - F...
Slowakije VI.145
Slowakije Stažnosti na ...
Slowakije VI.106
Slowakije futbal
Slowakije Design-logo-d...
Slowakije V.208
Slowakije V.189
Slowakije stadio
Slowakije VI.149
Slowakije VI.125
Slowakije VI.88
Slowakije V.176
Slowakije SILA TÍMU
Slowakije VI.103
Slowakije V.148
Slowakije super zápasy
Slowakije Ponuky generá...
Slowakije Slovenské Sup...
Slowakije V.148
Slowakije stavanie záze...
Slowakije Tipovacia súť...
Slowakije V.172
Slowakije pro evolution...
Slowakije Corgoň liga a...
Slowakije VI.138
Slowakije 2x zaspievaná...
Slowakije Tvorba Loga
Slowakije A.C.A.B. CUP
Slowakije Najlepší stre...
Slowakije Šlapak
Slowakije V.201
Slowakije VI.154
Slowakije VI.142
Slowakije Horna nitra C...
Slowakije VI.148
Slowakije VI.97
Slowakije VI.144
Slowakije Súťaž o 40 kr...
Slowakije VI.112
Slowakije MS vo Futbale...
Slowakije kupovanie zam...
Slowakije Hlasovanie - ...
Slowakije V.242
Slowakije Priatelsky du...
Slowakije ZAPASY PRIJMA...
Slowakije PPMliga-turna...
Slowakije Majstrovstvá ...
Slowakije V.178
Slowakije IV.24 Ligové ...
Slowakije VI.128
Slowakije VI.54
Slowakije Turnaj - UEFA...
Slowakije Turnaj - Prem...
Slowakije Liga majstrov
Slowakije VI.110
Slowakije V.146
Australië Last Letter -...
Slowakije V.256
Slowakije VI.114
Slowakije V.225
Slowakije VI.92
Slowakije V.246
Slowakije V.239
Slowakije V.237
Nieuwste berichten