Tijd:
Uitloggen
Onderwerp: Questions & Answers| Kies een land: |
|
VS |
Yeah I have pulled a bunch of "goalies" with 3-4.5 stars but they all have 2-10 points of goal tending.
Those guys are in no way goalies!
I've had a few of them also, but stars mean shit when it comes to actual game time... attributes are what count.
I've had a few of them also, but stars mean shit when it comes to actual game time... attributes are what count.
Are the goal/tech/pass Qs decent at least?
Me again ! 
How important are chemistry and experience over players' ratings ? I've heard something like 100 points of experience = 20% of player's skills (same for chemistry) !
How important are chemistry and experience over players' ratings ? I've heard something like 100 points of experience = 20% of player's skills (same for chemistry) !
I know - it seems that some teams just farm certain types - I produce good defense like crazy but I can't pull a winger or a goalie for my life. I get centers because of the passing atty that the d-men come with I swear.
Oh yeah, me too. I've pulled 2 Dmen with high Quality and over 250OR in the past 2 seasons (approx) but only 1 forward i would call a star.
That is because you scout your players in the outback! Where people are rugged and huge. Hence good D-men. You need to expand your scouting horizons... there is lost of offensive talent you just have to know where to look down under 
lol
lol
Hey my heart is in Dallas... what does that get me? LOL
Sergi Zubov
It is important, but I can't give you exact #s. I have 2 goalies, their stats differences are not too far off, but one has far more experience and chemistry. When my "Starter" is in net, I have like, 9 pucks rating for goalie, but with my backup in, who isn't drastically worse, I have like 6 or 5. The only major difference is experience and chemistry, because the backup doesn't play a lot of meaningful games
Iheard same thing.
no arguments on experience
but on the chemistry side, I have heard people talk about chemistry of the individual player, but isn't the more important thing the chemistry of the line?
For example I have a player with 31 chemistry, but the line he plays on has 86% chemistry. Isn't the more important number the line chemistry?
but on the chemistry side, I have heard people talk about chemistry of the individual player, but isn't the more important thing the chemistry of the line?
For example I have a player with 31 chemistry, but the line he plays on has 86% chemistry. Isn't the more important number the line chemistry?
To help give an idea of how important chemistry is, I sold my starting goalie earlier this year. He was at 100% chemistry with me and I had a goalie rating of 38. When he went to the new team he obviously had 0% chemistry, and he started with a rating of 33.
no, it carries over in full from season to season.
Je favoriete onderwerpen
Nieuwste berichten
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Alle rechten voorbehouden
Contacteer ons - Algemene Voorwaarden - Privacybeleid - Cookies settings - Portal map
Adverteren op PowerPlay Manager - Word onze partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 85ms / php: 45ms / db: 41ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contacteer ons - Algemene Voorwaarden - Privacybeleid - Cookies settings - Portal map
Adverteren op PowerPlay Manager - Word onze partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 85ms / php: 45ms / db: 41ms ]
Web server: WB2