I don't know what numbers are correct, but in my own experience I have never seen numbers varying with more then +/- 10-12%. But IzzaX may have done more research on it.
I know it sucks to be where you are right now, as I said, I have experience the same thing my self. But the last 2 seasons I have got two 5* deals. So over a longer period of time it evens out.
Selecciona un país: |
![]() |
Internacional |
Guys, if you are talking about +/- ranges, then you must take an average contract (3*) into account and then the maximum variation is about +/- 11%. Then we can talk about maximum possible contract (100%, with 5*) and the worst possible contract (1*), which can be up to about 20% lower than maximum.
On the first day of the new season it will revert back to 100.
You got less cause you got 2*,1*,1* . I got less (MS) with 5* (like last season). Thats something different
if i would get 1* i would understand why i got less and would accept it.

Thank you for the offer, but this formula dont help me even if its the right one. like i allready said, i thougt that the "stars" are the only random factor on sponsor offers, but now...?????
Anyone know how much the teams league table position influence the number of spectators in a game? Yesterday I played against the same team as today, and the only difference in the two machetes is that yesterday I was number 2 in the league and he number 3. Today we are both number 10.
Yesterdays attendance: 8,457
Today's attendance: 5,038
Is it really THAT important?
Yesterdays attendance: 8,457
Today's attendance: 5,038
Is it really THAT important?
yes it is. So much importance is put on the placing in the league its a bit silly.
There are huge difference between No.1 and No.2 let alone down to 10 or 20. Personally i think anyone in the top 8 should be roughly the same, then anyone not being relegated and those in danger of relegation.
Things like sponsor offers should also take into consideration how you went this season vs last. If you place higher then that should be good, if you place lower then not so good. As it is its just based on your placing in one season.
So the team that moves from 20 to 15th gets less than the team that moves from 10th to 14th. If i were a sponsor I would rather be backing the team on the way up not the way down.
There are huge difference between No.1 and No.2 let alone down to 10 or 20. Personally i think anyone in the top 8 should be roughly the same, then anyone not being relegated and those in danger of relegation.
Things like sponsor offers should also take into consideration how you went this season vs last. If you place higher then that should be good, if you place lower then not so good. As it is its just based on your placing in one season.
So the team that moves from 20 to 15th gets less than the team that moves from 10th to 14th. If i were a sponsor I would rather be backing the team on the way up not the way down.
Is there any order in CL droppings of players ? How on Earth can a player who's been 4 seasons 6/6, to have just 3 seasons of 5/6 ?
Players are getting useless to early IMO.
Players are getting useless to early IMO.
just because a player does not improve any more, doesn't mean he is useless. how much do you think a player who is 25 in real world can improve?
No. Not even the small ones.
Have that feeling like someone entered my team, and took almost all of my players one CL point. Totally unexplainable.
Have that feeling like someone entered my team, and took almost all of my players one CL point. Totally unexplainable.
There is age boundary that makes them train less every season. Isn't that fine obstacle just for itself ?
nope because then there would be no difference between 2 players of the same age. It is part of the game and you just have to live with it. It's strange that you have a problem with this after 8 seasons.
Differences are in their qualities of course.
And - Yes I have problem with it, because it's just one of million things here that are random. Take SA for instance, there are lot of clubs who don't have luck and get mainly bad players. What are their chance for getting up ? Market.
So, until now I thought by having player who is 4 seasons 6/6 I would have some security. When I searched players on market, I once knew what to look for. But no, I would have just another lucky draw from the system at the beginning of every season to see if I bought the right player.
It's strange that after 8 seasons I can't make plans that will stay solid for 5-6 seasons in future, but instead every now and then I have to revise each my plan and have nothing to hold on.
I thought this was manager game, where you can manage things, not lottery game. There are so few things that we can manage, and phrases like "in random we trust" or "lucky you" became like "hello" and "have a nice day" these days. Guess why ?
And - Yes I have problem with it, because it's just one of million things here that are random. Take SA for instance, there are lot of clubs who don't have luck and get mainly bad players. What are their chance for getting up ? Market.
So, until now I thought by having player who is 4 seasons 6/6 I would have some security. When I searched players on market, I once knew what to look for. But no, I would have just another lucky draw from the system at the beginning of every season to see if I bought the right player.
It's strange that after 8 seasons I can't make plans that will stay solid for 5-6 seasons in future, but instead every now and then I have to revise each my plan and have nothing to hold on.
I thought this was manager game, where you can manage things, not lottery game. There are so few things that we can manage, and phrases like "in random we trust" or "lucky you" became like "hello" and "have a nice day" these days. Guess why ?
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios