Изабери државу: |
![]() |
Међународно |
could be opponent if he gets significant more chances. if you chances are equally it should be tactics and teams defense skills (including maybe even center)
True. I'll take a look at my speadsheet, the answer to his stats has to be here somewhere.
since the salary calculation seems to be 'working as designed', I'll post the question here. what is the reasoning behind such incredibly low salaries?
currently my weekly player salaries are 1.1% of my weekly sponsor income.....
currently my weekly player salaries are 1.1% of my weekly sponsor income.....
I've been wondering that also. Seems a little out of whack eh?
maybe the sponsor contracts will be smaller next season and they just want us to be prepared

tuttle said in the bugs forum i think that think about 3 seasons time.
At the moment decent players have ~300AI. At 100AI a season ie ~0.8 a day plus training camps etc then in 3 seasons this will be 600AI.
I am assuming salaries are definately not linear and 600AI players will cost a lot.
Then think about 2 seasons after that.
All that does is take a 15yr old to be 20. Not even considering 25 or 30 years old.
At the moment decent players have ~300AI. At 100AI a season ie ~0.8 a day plus training camps etc then in 3 seasons this will be 600AI.
I am assuming salaries are definately not linear and 600AI players will cost a lot.
Then think about 2 seasons after that.
All that does is take a 15yr old to be 20. Not even considering 25 or 30 years old.
so it should even out in a few seasons ... I just hope that the sponsor income wont increase with the same non-linear function .

the increases im getting in sponsor offers between each season are getting smaller so im pretty sure it will plateau but the expenses wont.
What will be with teams without manager (like [hockey_team=36011])? And what will be with their players with OR more than 250?
according to tuttle in canucks357's comment feed:
(remember this is one side of convo and all comments are (sic))
"dont worry news will tell more, mainly, the whole economy system was considered, free agents which will come in approx one real year will be easier calculated for every manager if having some extra cash, besides that the players will be more expansive jus"
"the wages are only small percentage of your expenses, they were small percentage, they will be even now small percentage, you have to consider more facts when critsizing ... also league levels situation for example"
"but 2 weeks ago you were approximately here, besides that, the wages will grow, wait a bit, income will not grow so fast, team rating is limited"
He was then asked: Any chance staff salaries will be altered a bit too?
"staff not for sure, they are very valuable, they can boost up the facilities up to 50% so they must be expansive"
(remember this is one side of convo and all comments are (sic))
"dont worry news will tell more, mainly, the whole economy system was considered, free agents which will come in approx one real year will be easier calculated for every manager if having some extra cash, besides that the players will be more expansive jus"
"the wages are only small percentage of your expenses, they were small percentage, they will be even now small percentage, you have to consider more facts when critsizing ... also league levels situation for example"
"but 2 weeks ago you were approximately here, besides that, the wages will grow, wait a bit, income will not grow so fast, team rating is limited"
He was then asked: Any chance staff salaries will be altered a bit too?
"staff not for sure, they are very valuable, they can boost up the facilities up to 50% so they must be expansive"
I don;t know why I posted that as a response to you, you were there for that exchange
I really posted for the benefit of all.

I really posted for the benefit of all.
Твоје омиљене теме
Нове поруке на форуму