The number refers to the number of seats and the number in parentheses is the number of multi-purpose stands.
Stadiums:
1) STL Saints - 28,000(7)
2) Sterling Cheetahs FC - 33,100(4)
3) MK Ultras - 24,800 (5)
4) Covington Rowdies - 29,600 (2)
5) Coconut Typhoon - 20,800 (4)
6) The Death Munchers - 19,200 (3)
7) Firestorm - 17,600 (2)
8) Zucciny Warriors - 20,000(1)
9) Silly Nannies - 12,000(2)
10) Boca AC - 16,800
11) Jogos - 15,600
12) Nuln FC - 14,000
13) Presidents - 13,200
14) Mobile Rain - 10,800
Queen City FC - 10,800
16) New York Cosmos - 7,200
17) FC Bozewak - 6,400
18) ZEMLJORADNIK - 3,850
国名を選択して下さい: |
![]() |
USA |
For positional strengths, I applied the extrapolations for these rankings. I made assumptions on who the best players were for each team and what formation a team will probably use. These can change easily based on a manager using a different formation, but this should provide a general ranking.
The number is the positional strength and the number in parentheses is the rating of the goalie.
Goaltending:
1) STL Saints - 97(19)
2) Nuln FC - 93(19)
3) Firestorm - 91(18)
4) Coconut Typhoon - 87(17)
5) MK Ultras - 84(17)
6) ZEMLJORADNIK - 82(17)
7) Mobile Rain - 81(16)
8) Covington Rowdies - 78(16)
9) The Death Munchers - 74(15)
Boca AC - 74(15)
11) Zucciny Warriors - ~68(14)
12) FC Bozewak - 66(13)
13) Presidents - 64(13)
Silly Nannies - 64(13)
15) Jogos - 56(11)
16) Sterling Cheetahs - 56(11)
17) The Big Cigars(t) - 52(19)
18) Queen City FC - 44(9)
19) Buckeyes(t) - 40(14)
20) New York Cosmos - 35(7)
21) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 34 (12)
22) Samurai(t) - 23(8)
The number is the positional strength and the number in parentheses is the rating of the goalie.
Goaltending:
1) STL Saints - 97(19)
2) Nuln FC - 93(19)
3) Firestorm - 91(18)
4) Coconut Typhoon - 87(17)
5) MK Ultras - 84(17)
6) ZEMLJORADNIK - 82(17)
7) Mobile Rain - 81(16)
8) Covington Rowdies - 78(16)
9) The Death Munchers - 74(15)
Boca AC - 74(15)
11) Zucciny Warriors - ~68(14)
12) FC Bozewak - 66(13)
13) Presidents - 64(13)
Silly Nannies - 64(13)
15) Jogos - 56(11)
16) Sterling Cheetahs - 56(11)
17) The Big Cigars(t) - 52(19)
18) Queen City FC - 44(9)
19) Buckeyes(t) - 40(14)
20) New York Cosmos - 35(7)
21) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 34 (12)
22) Samurai(t) - 23(8)
~ indicates an estimate.
Defense:
1) Firestorm - 125
2) STL Saints - ~121
3) The Death Munchers - 110
4) Zucciny Warriors - ~103
5) Silly Nannies - 102
6) Covington Rowdies - ~98
7) MK Ultras - 97
Jogos - 97
9) Mobile Rain - 94
10) Coconut Typhoon - 86
Nuln FC - 86
12) Sterling Cheetahs FC - 82
13) Boca AC - 79
14) Queen City FC - 75
FC Bozewak - ~75
16) ZEMLJORADNIK - ~74
17) Presidents - 71
18) The Big Cigars(t) - 62
19) New York Cosmos - 54
20) Samurai(t) - 49
21) Buckeyes(t) - 48
22) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 47
Defense:
1) Firestorm - 125
2) STL Saints - ~121
3) The Death Munchers - 110
4) Zucciny Warriors - ~103
5) Silly Nannies - 102
6) Covington Rowdies - ~98
7) MK Ultras - 97
Jogos - 97
9) Mobile Rain - 94
10) Coconut Typhoon - 86
Nuln FC - 86
12) Sterling Cheetahs FC - 82
13) Boca AC - 79
14) Queen City FC - 75
FC Bozewak - ~75
16) ZEMLJORADNIK - ~74
17) Presidents - 71
18) The Big Cigars(t) - 62
19) New York Cosmos - 54
20) Samurai(t) - 49
21) Buckeyes(t) - 48
22) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 47
Midfielding:
1) FC Bozewak - 124
2) Sterling Cheetahs FC - 122
3) Firestorm - 116
4) STL Saints - 112
5) Presidents - 108
6) Silly Nannies - 102
7) The Death Munchers - 99
8) Mobile Rain - 95
9) Queen City FC - 90
Covington Rowdies - ~90
11) MK Ultras - 88
12) Coconut Typhoon - 84
13) Jogos - 80
14) Nuln FC - 78
ZEMLJORADNIK - ~78
16) Zucciny Warriors - ~73
17) Boca AC - 75
18) Samurai(t) - 57
19) The Big Cigars(t) - 56
20) New York Cosmos - 41
21) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 39
22) Buckeyes(t) - 37
1) FC Bozewak - 124
2) Sterling Cheetahs FC - 122
3) Firestorm - 116
4) STL Saints - 112
5) Presidents - 108
6) Silly Nannies - 102
7) The Death Munchers - 99
8) Mobile Rain - 95
9) Queen City FC - 90
Covington Rowdies - ~90
11) MK Ultras - 88
12) Coconut Typhoon - 84
13) Jogos - 80
14) Nuln FC - 78
ZEMLJORADNIK - ~78
16) Zucciny Warriors - ~73
17) Boca AC - 75
18) Samurai(t) - 57
19) The Big Cigars(t) - 56
20) New York Cosmos - 41
21) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 39
22) Buckeyes(t) - 37
The number is the positional strength and the number in parentheses is the rating of the forward.
Offense:
1) STL Saitns - ~70(34)
2) Zucciny Warriors - ~71(18)
3) Firestorm - 62(25)
4) Boca AC - 61(24)
5) Sterling Cheetahs - 61(22)
MK Ultras - ~61(22)
7) Covington Rowdies - ~60(19)
8) The Death Munchers - 52(23)
9) Presidents - 56(20)
10) Coconut Typhoon - 47(23)
11) ZEMLJORADNIK - ~49(20)
12) Jogos - 50(18)
13) FC Bozewak - ~52(16)
14) Nuln FC - 47(18)
15) Mobile Rain - 39(14)
16) Silly Nannies - 39(13)
17) Queen City FC - 31(19)
18) New York Cosmos - 35(15)
19) The Big Cigars(t) - 34(23)
20) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 27(28)
21) Buckeyes(t) - 23(16)
22) Samurai(t) - 21(15)
Offense:
1) STL Saitns - ~70(34)
2) Zucciny Warriors - ~71(18)
3) Firestorm - 62(25)
4) Boca AC - 61(24)
5) Sterling Cheetahs - 61(22)
MK Ultras - ~61(22)
7) Covington Rowdies - ~60(19)
8) The Death Munchers - 52(23)
9) Presidents - 56(20)
10) Coconut Typhoon - 47(23)
11) ZEMLJORADNIK - ~49(20)
12) Jogos - 50(18)
13) FC Bozewak - ~52(16)
14) Nuln FC - 47(18)
15) Mobile Rain - 39(14)
16) Silly Nannies - 39(13)
17) Queen City FC - 31(19)
18) New York Cosmos - 35(15)
19) The Big Cigars(t) - 34(23)
20) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 27(28)
21) Buckeyes(t) - 23(16)
22) Samurai(t) - 21(15)
Total Team Strength:
1) STL Saints - ~100
2) Firestorm - 99
3) The Death Munchers - 84
4) MK Ultras - ~83
5) Covington Rowdies - ~82
6) Sterling Cheetahs - ~80
7) Zucciny Warriors - ~79
FC Bozewak - ~70
9) Coconut Typhoon - 77
10) Silly Nannies - 77
11) Mobile Rain - 77
12) Nuln FC - 76
13) Presidents - 75
14) Boca AC - 72
15) Jogos - 71
ZEMLJORADNIK - ~71
17) Queen City FC - 60
18) The Big Cigars(t) - 51
19) New York Cosmos - 41
20) Buckeyes(t) - 40
21) Samurai(t) - 38
22) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 37
1) STL Saints - ~100
2) Firestorm - 99
3) The Death Munchers - 84
4) MK Ultras - ~83
5) Covington Rowdies - ~82
6) Sterling Cheetahs - ~80
7) Zucciny Warriors - ~79
FC Bozewak - ~70
9) Coconut Typhoon - 77
10) Silly Nannies - 77
11) Mobile Rain - 77
12) Nuln FC - 76
13) Presidents - 75
14) Boca AC - 72
15) Jogos - 71
ZEMLJORADNIK - ~71
17) Queen City FC - 60
18) The Big Cigars(t) - 51
19) New York Cosmos - 41
20) Buckeyes(t) - 40
21) Samurai(t) - 38
22) N.@.New York Cosmos(t) - 37
Dang capsaicin, you need to hurry up and promote so you can do all this cool analysis stuff for us I.1 teams
.

I generally ranked by total team strength but gave bonuses to teams with good training/regeneration facilities or teams that are more likely to have spare money.
Predicted Final Rankings
1) STL Saints
2) Firestorm
3) The Death Munchers
4) MK Ultras
5) Covington Rowdies
6) Sterling Cheetahs FC
7) Coconut Typhoon
8) Zucciny Warriors
9) Nuln FC
10) Jogos
11) Presidents
12) Mobile Rain
13) Silly Nannies
14) Boca AC
15) FC Bozewak
16) ZEMLJORADNIK
17) Queen City FC
18) New York Cosmos
19) The Big CIgars(t)
20) N.@.New York Cosmos(t)
21) Buckeyes(t)
22) Samurai(t)
This should be an extremely competitive season. anyone between third place and sixteenth place could beat anyone else in that range and have a good season. Teams like FC Bozewak and ZEMLJORADNIK who are putting a lot of money into players could surprise some of the more established teams. Of course, injuries and acquisitions could change the balance of power at any point.
Predicted Final Rankings
1) STL Saints
2) Firestorm
3) The Death Munchers
4) MK Ultras
5) Covington Rowdies
6) Sterling Cheetahs FC
7) Coconut Typhoon
8) Zucciny Warriors
9) Nuln FC
10) Jogos
11) Presidents
12) Mobile Rain
13) Silly Nannies
14) Boca AC
15) FC Bozewak
16) ZEMLJORADNIK
17) Queen City FC
18) New York Cosmos
19) The Big CIgars(t)
20) N.@.New York Cosmos(t)
21) Buckeyes(t)
22) Samurai(t)
This should be an extremely competitive season. anyone between third place and sixteenth place could beat anyone else in that range and have a good season. Teams like FC Bozewak and ZEMLJORADNIK who are putting a lot of money into players could surprise some of the more established teams. Of course, injuries and acquisitions could change the balance of power at any point.
I basically looked at the most recent game and determined whether a team was not using its best players in the game. If a team was not using its best players, I found the ratings for those players and substituted the players with the best ratings into the most likely formation for the most recent game. For instance, if a team has defenders with ratings of 15,10,15 and an injured CD with a rating of 15 (and the team seems to use 3 defenders), then I multiplied the teams positional team strength for defense(assume it is 50) by 45/40 (resulting in 56 rounded). I don't really know how ratings are calculated, so this is probably not a very accurate method, but it produces numbers close to the numbers I remember for some teams.
I intend to promote this year, even if I'm forced to make an expensive acquisition at the midpoint of the season.
I made a similar analysis at the beginning of last season and decided to make another one for this year once the number of camps went down. I wasn't too accurate last year in the predictions, partly due to the excessive amount of teams folding, but it was close enough.
I made a similar analysis at the beginning of last season and decided to make another one for this year once the number of camps went down. I wasn't too accurate last year in the predictions, partly due to the excessive amount of teams folding, but it was close enough.
oh, i have collected lots of info. that is how i calculate the best possible formation to get the best team strength. To finish it, id have to pretty much throw my season away to collect enough data to build a formula.
if you intend, then its better to get player now so he gets some chemistry.
I plan to save most of my money to upgrade my stadium next season. I would only buy a player as an act of desperation if my team is not performing well enough.
お気に入りのスレッド
最新の投稿