Selecciona un país: |
![]() |
Internacional |
Why are you saying it hasn't been updated, if I can see 30% in the guide?
If it was Sarth he wasn't here for quite a while so maybe he isn't acquainted yet with new rules.

Yes, it could be a cause but ... they should be penalized ! The ones who had 2 teams (or the ones who broke any other rule) could say same thing
!
If nothing will be done, a precedent will be created !

If nothing will be done, a precedent will be created !

Yes and no.
The rule is only broken if BOTH teams are involved, as that's unsportsmanlike. If only 1 team is, then the other team is simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.
That said, in most games a warning is usually given for first offenses, or offenses where guilt can not be fully proven, so I do believe a warning should be pretty much what to expect.
The rule is only broken if BOTH teams are involved, as that's unsportsmanlike. If only 1 team is, then the other team is simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.
That said, in most games a warning is usually given for first offenses, or offenses where guilt can not be fully proven, so I do believe a warning should be pretty much what to expect.
U cannot say that this example is not an understanding between managers. check the goal-keeper from the first game and u got your answer.

I made a assumption after misreading mrk's message. My bad, 30% it is anyway.
My team will not perform better if they are warned or banned ! For me is same thing...
I just want that these kind of matches to disappear 'cause is not fair to the other users !
I just want that these kind of matches to disappear 'cause is not fair to the other users !
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios