Selecciona un país: |
![]() |
Estados Unidos |
I take my time and buy decent Q players, I think that's why my pulls suck so bad it must balance out, I am not sure but that is how it seems.
I pulled an 82, scouted. And its no lie. I talked about him earlier in this thread.
Finally, someone starts making some sense! I applaud you, good sir.
Scout him. I pulled him around 69AQ, but after scouting he showed up as an 82. I even posted his actual Qs here because I was stunned.
Well it's obvious that my scouts lie as well, COLLUSION I TELL YOU!
Had 2 fairly good pulls out of 3 possible. Now just waiting to see how my 2 pulls will do in training.
Yeah Sanderson was pulled this season, fully scouted at 86 avQ. I pulled a guy today who shows up initially as 84 AvQ and 244 OR, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was more like 78-80 avQ.
But, see, I wouldn't care if the avg Q is low as long as the Q at key attributes is high. If I have a forward, and his defense attribute Q is 1, I could not care less.
So let's keep things in perspective a little bit.
So let's keep things in perspective a little bit.
Agreed. The 82 I pulled works out to about a 92 at Center because of where he is highest. And I have another C that has an AvgQ of 76 that is about an 88 at C (47 at shot and 66 at Agr pulled his AvgQ down).
Exactly. I wish the game would give us that instead, because my guy Móric Poolomčak is a 79 AQ, but for the 3 for C brings up an AQ of 93
Unfortunately a position based AQ is really dependent upon what ratios you use for all the attributes (not just the primary 3). So even if there was implemented in game it would only serve a subset of the user base.
Fortunately some stud is making a tool that helps evaluate these types of questions.
Fortunately some stud is making a tool that helps evaluate these types of questions.
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios