Tiempo:
Salir
Asunto: Questions & Answers| Selecciona un país: |
|
Internacional |
btw does anyone know if shooting affects the individual matchrating? would for example a forward without good shooting still be able to get a good rating?
But it is very different, 9,5 gives 10 in rating. Double both, 18=20 which is false, 18 = 18. Rounding up gives some error, and ofc chem and exp has an impact.
I don't know wich math did you use there, but 9,5*2 its 19 not 18. Still, may be its my bad english but i don't understand your point.
Last season forwards were better rated with higher shooting.
Is it ok, when goalkeeper has rating 11 with such attributes:
313-22-34-31-24 Exp(49)
313-22-34-31-24 Exp(49)
Yes, because hi only have main skill!
Yep, because he's pretty much crap. He has no secondary attributes, and the system heavily punishes players who have single attributes like this.
I hope you didn't pay a lot for the guy.
I hope you didn't pay a lot for the guy.
Simone in chargé that could anser this one? Decrease in general or just för bad players
But this player have 424 attributes... 424/11(rating) = 38,5
My GK: 113 31 83 76 37 = 340 attributes... 340/9(rating)=37,8
So... first player isnt punished that much.
My GK: 113 31 83 76 37 = 340 attributes... 340/9(rating)=37,8
So... first player isnt punished that much.
I honestly think there are some glitches in new playerratings, I already pointed out an impossible rating in bugs topic, still no answer though
Yes, but how do their total attributes look?
A good goalie should have a good balance of attributes. Most people tend to work with 100-75-75-40-25 (goal, speed, tech, head, pass) or a variation of that.
If you have a goalie who has a total AI of 500 but their primary is 350 of that, they're actually a far worse goalie than someone with a total AI of 400 who has a good balance of attributes.
A good goalie should have a good balance of attributes. Most people tend to work with 100-75-75-40-25 (goal, speed, tech, head, pass) or a variation of that.
If you have a goalie who has a total AI of 500 but their primary is 350 of that, they're actually a far worse goalie than someone with a total AI of 400 who has a good balance of attributes.
Further reading... yeah, i would have picked your GK to be better rated than that guy.
I agree that good balance of attributes should give you a better player.
But... good balance means: min. attributes for max. rating. This first "wrong" trained goalie need almost the same attributes as second "good" trained goalie for 1 rating. So... I dont see the benefits of balancing the attributes.
But... good balance means: min. attributes for max. rating. This first "wrong" trained goalie need almost the same attributes as second "good" trained goalie for 1 rating. So... I dont see the benefits of balancing the attributes.
Ok then... we are on the same page 
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Todos los derechos reservados
Contacto - Términos de Servicio - Políticas de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del portal
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Conviértete en nuestro socio!
Compañeros: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 142ms / php: 81ms / db: 61ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contacto - Términos de Servicio - Políticas de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del portal
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Conviértete en nuestro socio!
Compañeros: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 142ms / php: 81ms / db: 61ms ]
Web server: WB1