时间:
退出登录
主题: Questions & Answers| 选择一个国家: |
|
加拿大 |
If they had 99 quality in all attys and you trained 40 on defense then he becomes a defensemen and u train him that way. if you train him for forward he will be a forward and u train him that way.
while i respect your point, i think i have an idea of why some managers might train defense for that centre.
maybe his team gets raped with too many penalties, so he keeps on losing because of all the ppgoals. to reduce the ppgoals scored against, he might train a "defensive centre" rather than a regular "offensive centre"
just a thought i had in my mind (:
maybe his team gets raped with too many penalties, so he keeps on losing because of all the ppgoals. to reduce the ppgoals scored against, he might train a "defensive centre" rather than a regular "offensive centre"
just a thought i had in my mind (:
I train D on 3 of my 4 Centers. Especially the ones I use on PK. I train D on some wingers too. Not all. But some. I wish the GE required D for Fwds and O for D more but sadly it doesn't.
Here's what he's saying.
Two players, same qualities, same starting attributes.
We'll say 40 offense and 20 everything else.
His claim is that if you decide to make that player as a defense, he won't be as good because his def is 20 lower than his off from the start.
I don't fully understand why he is saying this though.
Two players, same qualities, same starting attributes.
We'll say 40 offense and 20 everything else.
His claim is that if you decide to make that player as a defense, he won't be as good because his def is 20 lower than his off from the start.
I don't fully understand why he is saying this though.
Indeed. Regardless what it's referred to, there is no penalty for doing so.... it's a managers choice to train their player less offensively and more defensively. The trade-off of that type of training is that the center with defense is not going to be as good at the center position as the other.
It's no different from me having 2 wingers and not training one of them at shooting. is there a penalty for his lower shot? Yeah, but it's only there because i choose not to train shooting.
It's no different from me having 2 wingers and not training one of them at shooting. is there a penalty for his lower shot? Yeah, but it's only there because i choose not to train shooting.
Do I have a center or a goalie? Q's G-78 D-55 O-79 S-85 P-79 T-81 A-50. Thoughts?
Both! Make a complete player!!! 100G, 100O, 50S, 50P, 50T, 50A. Can play 3/4 positions!
I would train him as a center (with shooting) if you would keep Jim in your team, as a goalie if you would plan to sell him... 
When you pulled him, what exactly were his goaltending and offense attributes?
It depends if you play to keep him or sell him. If you plan to train and sell him, then a goalie would be the better (faster) option.
Less relevant compared to Qs...
..very relevalant to caculate the WP(T)P.
Not really. If he chooses to train him as a goalie, then he'll be a goalie. Same goes if he chooses to train him as a center. He may be a center now based on attributes, but that can be changed with training.
center otherwise nice shooting Q would be useless... Especially considering primary is good but not that great...
But it's so close, depending on attributes, it might be considered in the decision.
But it's so close, depending on attributes, it might be considered in the decision.
你喜欢的游戏主题
最新主题
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - 保留所有权利
联系方式 - 服务条款 - 隐私政策 - Cookies settings - 网站地图
PowerPlay Manager上的广告 - 成为我们的合作伙伴！
合作伙伴: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 130ms / php: 70ms / db: 60ms ]
Web server: WB2
联系方式 - 服务条款 - 隐私政策 - Cookies settings - 网站地图
PowerPlay Manager上的广告 - 成为我们的合作伙伴！
合作伙伴: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 130ms / php: 70ms / db: 60ms ]
Web server: WB2