The bug is in the transfer-screen.
When I click on GS I want to sort all players by GS. Ok - if I click on it a player with 95 GS is sort as the best. (next one has 190 GS then 179 GS etc.)
If I click on GS again I get the worst players beginning with GS 105.
So the player with 95 GS is sorted as the best one - in fact he's the worst one.
選擇國家: |
![]() |
國際 |
Wanna show 3 matches where I've played with 3 CMs and I lost too ? (check my games against NoNames)
so far I was thinking your formation and a little bit of bad luck were the reason for your bad results...now I'm starting to think they developed a bug especially for you....
I dont see why you would have a problem with this to be honest...
You vacated your midfield so you got hammered there.
Heres an experiment for you...
Play the exact same formation as team no name, play normal - normal, and I guarantee you will beat them as you can train your players, buy players... basically do stuff that a team no name cannot do!
If your gonna experiment with your formation, you must accept it when you get beaten.
You vacated your midfield so you got hammered there.
Heres an experiment for you...
Play the exact same formation as team no name, play normal - normal, and I guarantee you will beat them as you can train your players, buy players... basically do stuff that a team no name cannot do!
If your gonna experiment with your formation, you must accept it when you get beaten.
Look here:
soccer.powerplaymanager.c... 0-4
soccer.powerplaymanager.c... exactly same tactic, 3-0 (opponent played on high)
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
'You vacated your midfield so you got hammered there.'
Hmmm, ok... now look here:
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
while in:
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
I don't get the idea !
P.S. I don't mind that I've get beaten, but why always against NoNames ? (don;t tell me about match importance)
soccer.powerplaymanager.c... 0-4
soccer.powerplaymanager.c... exactly same tactic, 3-0 (opponent played on high)
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
'You vacated your midfield so you got hammered there.'
Hmmm, ok... now look here:
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
while in:
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
I don't get the idea !
P.S. I don't mind that I've get beaten, but why always against NoNames ? (don;t tell me about match importance)
Hmmm...
I could understand a defeat in 1/2 games while you have dominated... but they sure are a strange set of results.
It could be a tactical issue, but I just dont know!!
I could understand a defeat in 1/2 games while you have dominated... but they sure are a strange set of results.
It could be a tactical issue, but I just dont know!!
ive noticed from my matches that match importance is quite important. but then again you said not to say that.
Something strange related to the fouls...
All my starting 11 have between 10 and 20 fouls committed, with the exception of my two strikers (i play 3-5-2) that have 35 and 41 fouls each..
It can't be normal...
All my starting 11 have between 10 and 20 fouls committed, with the exception of my two strikers (i play 3-5-2) that have 35 and 41 fouls each..
It can't be normal...
It's like mine... my 2 forwards have 12 yellow cards in total, while my 3 defenders only have 2
你喜歡的遊戲主題
最新主題