Наслов: I thought there was a penalty.

My team has been performing miracles and had a 12 game winning streak until today. Now, I expect losses and it really isn't that big of a deal but I don't like being told one thing and the results being another. We were told that managers who didn't rest their players would get severe penalties and would not be a winning strategy. Bull crap. The team I played didn't sub and beat me. I sure didn't see a penalty to them. It isn't like I have a number one team but damn it, if I am playing like I am supposed to and my opponent is playing how the game says not to, it should be a win for me when all teams are at this level. Especially when I am told not subbing gets severe penalties. The one that seems to have gotten penalized is me. And NO I am not using the game analyzer. I know what it will say. "You got f__ed."

You still outscored him 42-33 in the second half. I think he just built such a strong lead that the penalty didn't even matter.

My team sucked in the first half I agree. But it sure doesn't seem a big penalty. Especially when up to this game we had split when he was subbing. Either the no subbing is fixed or it isn't.

when the penalty was implemented i was getting beaten by 40+ and was being penalized from start to end.

Maybe they adjusted was the penalty may have been too harsh. Maybe now it penalizes more to 3rd and 4th quarters.

If that is the case then we are still running beta. If they tell us there is a big penalty then there should be one.

Same team has won 4 in a row not using subs. Not much of penalty there. Seems like a winning strategy to me.

will try/test again on my friendly. I was loosing badly after the change.

looks like penalty might still be working
1Q 16x24 - minus 8pts
2Q 21x20 - plus 1pt
3Q 16x26 - minus 10pts
4Q 20x31 - minus 11pts

Dunno, lost in my friendly today against a team who played 3 players the entire game and one over 36 minutes. He outscored me in the 4th quarter.