Temat: II.1

.47, with people in the .67 range down to the .24 range (some palyers I'm about to release)

I'm right here, if they want to show me I'm wrong feel free to come challenge me.

0.447 for my team today, with two injuries and plenty of junk. My two highest though were .63 and .60 so that's quite nice to see.

Oops. I escaped with a win today despite totally forgetting to change my lines or tactics haha. My starting goalie was back from injury and forgot to put him in today, too. :>

Oh well, that makes up for one of my mysterious losses earlier this season haha.

crapski.

Crap-on-a-stick, I thought I played on Low. Nice waste of Normal energy there in a loss haha. Also didn't help that I telegraphed my tactics.

Bright side: My starting goalie's finally back and was apparently the only guy who didn't suck in that game. :>

Ugh. My team's head physician Floyd Guy just got his new contract. A raise from $1120 to a whopping $4650!

Good thing he's the team's head doctor, cause his raise is making me sick. lol.

But when you want quality (he has 37 treatment, mid-90s in Quality), I guess you've got to pay for it. It's one of those areas I never want to skimp on.

Geoffrey Whitman
My recent Right D pull Geoffrey Whitman. Just got fully scouted today.

96Q Defense, 96Q Passing, 97Q Aggression.
Only 55Q Tech... but I'll take it!

Now, somebody can explain me the result of the my last game? Even if I am happy with it, this shouldn't happen I think. And the arena was not full either...

The arena part can be explained by your distance in the standings -- two teams closer to each other gets more fans in the seats.

The result of your game though is just inexplicable. The only way it could really make sense is if your club played the right counter-tactic -- but if I remember right, Offensive vs Normal is a wash (Breaking is the "Normal" counter).

I had a similarly strange game though I won 7:4. In my first game vs the Notso Fastos, he played the right counter-tactic and outshot me 41-19 to win 3:2.

In today's game though? I played Offensive (on Normal) vs his Counter (on Low) and outshot him 41-25.

His team's actually a little stronger than mine, and our tactics were a wash, and Normal vs Low usually doesn't result in such a wide swing in shots.

Full moon? :>

Also you were home. Low on the road is a killer Plus you tend to get more shots on offensive. Nice win.

TY guys, I thought if a higher position teams visit a lower one the arena will be full, but maybe this isn't the case

I don't have any evidence to back this up so it is merely an "observation based on a limited sample" but it seems like Offense plays very well against normal.

Back when I started i only played normal and I tracked my W-L against different styles and my worst pct was against offense. Now, I never did the work to see if thats because only stronger teams played offensive at that time or if it was directly related to the actual tactics. But I do know there are those that believe there are multiple counter tactics to each tactic.

Offensive vs normal isn't bad - it's actually pretty much a wash when compared with normal vs normal, but it really depends on the skillset of your team as well. There is a lot to matching your skills to the style of play. My team does crappy using 1 tactic even if it is the correct counter tactic.

Obviously, I'm not telling which one that is

I know the guide says so, but I don't buy the idea that there's a "stronger" tactic based on your team's makeup. From the games I've played, I've noticed no difference with what I'm playing -- I've only seen straight tactic vs tactic differences.

Although with many things in this game, everyone's mileage may vary, so whatever works for you is what works.

I could, however, buy into the idea that there's a "weaker" counter-tactic to each.