დრო:
გამოსვლა ანგარიშიდან
თემა: I.1
| აირჩიე ქვეყანა: |
|
ამერიკის შეერთებული შტატები |
Nice to see the gap closing at the top. 3 team race. Better for I.1
I'm surprised to see bulls going with his backups/2nd team against a team as good as the mountaineers. It looks like his goaltending, offense, and shooting were all below what they would typically be at.
I'm a firm believer that playing starters on low is better 9 times out of 10 than playing backups on high or very high.
You can't argue with too many of Bulls' strategic decisions this season, but that one just seems a little odd to me.
I'm a firm believer that playing starters on low is better 9 times out of 10 than playing backups on high or very high.
You can't argue with too many of Bulls' strategic decisions this season, but that one just seems a little odd to me.
I just assumed that he had at least some backups in. His offense pretty much all season has been 32. Today it was 31. His shooting at it's best is 26. Today it was 25. His goaltending at it's best is 33. Today it was 31.
If he wasn't playing different players, why would his team ratings go down? I find it hard to believe that he's burning that much energy that his team would've deteriorated for that reason alone.
If he wasn't playing different players, why would his team ratings go down? I find it hard to believe that he's burning that much energy that his team would've deteriorated for that reason alone.
Maybe one of his starters was injured.
Checked that too, and didn't notice anything out of the ordinary (no injuries on his team).
If he actually had all his normal guys playing, I'm kind of shocked to see that sort of deterioration.
If he actually had all his normal guys playing, I'm kind of shocked to see that sort of deterioration.
It looks like he had all of the top OR players on his team playing. With that said, it's probably just a matter of rounding and energy so that they probably deteriorated from 31.5 to 31.49, etc. (an immaterial change).
mmm. that's true.
in looking at it more though, I might've figured out another reason too. His team's offense and shooting dipped almost immediately after he sold Ervin Morris a week or so ago.
If you guys were looking for a window of opportunity, that might be it. Even though he was more of a depth guy (at 296 OR lol), his experience probably made him a fairly decent piece of Bulls' lineup. 3 losses since he sold him is definitely interesting.
in looking at it more though, I might've figured out another reason too. His team's offense and shooting dipped almost immediately after he sold Ervin Morris a week or so ago.
If you guys were looking for a window of opportunity, that might be it. Even though he was more of a depth guy (at 296 OR lol), his experience probably made him a fairly decent piece of Bulls' lineup. 3 losses since he sold him is definitely interesting.
On a (very loosely) related side note... it looks like Bulls isn't on a handball pro-pack anymore? Is the general consensus of I.1 that you don't really need it?
There are fewer players to keep track of, though there might be more potential to customize players, especially at this point in the game where many players are flawed and the proper ratios remain undetermined. The free use of the market scout is nice, but not critical. Having the extra room for scouting helps, especially for the national team, though it is less necessary for now since it still takes a fair amount of time to scout 5 players.
interesting point on there being less players (than hockey and soccer). The same can be said for basketball, so I have to wonder if ppm is incorporating such things in their growth projections.
American football would be a great sport to get propack users on. No way anyone would want to manually train a team of 50-70 guys lol. Probably won't ever happen though since most of the user base here is eastern european.
I was thinking the team analysis features would be worth it in the I.1 though...
American football would be a great sport to get propack users on. No way anyone would want to manually train a team of 50-70 guys lol. Probably won't ever happen though since most of the user base here is eastern european.
I was thinking the team analysis features would be worth it in the I.1 though...
Pro is 2 expensive, and also its not hard to set up training manually for 20 or so guys.
It takes me like 10 minuts to change training in all 3 sports. So not a big deal.
you do it daily? ... or less regularly?
შენი გამორჩეული თემები
უახლესი ფოსტები
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - ყველა უფლება დაცულია
კონტაქტი - მომსახურეობა - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - საიტის რუკა
რეკლამა PowerPlay Manager–ზე - გახდი ჩვენი პარტნიორი!
პარტნიორები: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 157ms / php: 80ms / db: 76ms ]
Web server: WB1
კონტაქტი - მომსახურეობა - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - საიტის რუკა
რეკლამა PowerPlay Manager–ზე - გახდი ჩვენი პარტნიორი!
პარტნიორები: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 157ms / php: 80ms / db: 76ms ]
Web server: WB1