Ora:
Esci
Oggetto: Questions & Answers| Seleziona una nazione: |
|
Internazionale |
Thanx. I've been leaning towards parking too, becuase if all have very little effect, parking is at least the chepest. So parking it shall be.
Cheapest means even less effect. Seriously, these accessories are not worth the money you spend to build and to maintain them. I've had parking on level 3 and the other 3 on level 1. Teared them down cause it had zero to none effect on the visitors count.
Perhaps on maxed out stadiums they would make sense but otherwise - no.
Perhaps on maxed out stadiums they would make sense but otherwise - no.
I kind of tend to give you some reason on that, based on my observations, which I must stress is pure speculation.
till when this error with the fouls and yellow cards
I'm still very damage by this, is amazing, I almost always play in "Cautious" and I have the same or more cards than my opponent the playing on "aggressive"
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
33 against 7 is a joke
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
This is the only game that is affected which plays in aggressive
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
and the last played... the best of all
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
This is normal? or is part of the randomness of the game, which so far is the answer to every problem.
Please do something to fix this
I'm still very damage by this, is amazing, I almost always play in "Cautious" and I have the same or more cards than my opponent the playing on "aggressive"
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
33 against 7 is a joke
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
This is the only game that is affected which plays in aggressive
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
and the last played... the best of all
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
This is normal? or is part of the randomness of the game, which so far is the answer to every problem.
Please do something to fix this
I can tell you:
Aggressive: 1.5 yellow cards per game
Normal: 1.2
Careful: 1.0
Aggressive: 1.5 yellow cards per game
Normal: 1.2
Careful: 1.0
in most of these matches, your opponent has more fouls and cards than you.
Thank you, I said this is bad should toughen the penalty for playing on aggressive
is that you've understood my question and this answer is only to confuse.
why are rewarding that plays aggressive where are the red cards for which plays that way, for you that is normal?
and Beejay data make clear my question and annoyance, the penalty for playing this way is minimal.
why are rewarding that plays aggressive where are the red cards for which plays that way, for you that is normal?
and Beejay data make clear my question and annoyance, the penalty for playing this way is minimal.
It is what it is. There are advantages and disadvantages to playing aggressive. I think it is ok when you look at the long term stats. If you think it is better to play aggressive, why don't you play that way?
Unfortunately, it is the truth... "It is what it is".
long term according to the described data is minimal difference, and never said that the best is play aggressive, I have said that you are rewarded hitting the rival, but if that is your answer, I'll not keep with the topic, I think knowing the next response.
long term according to the described data is minimal difference, and never said that the best is play aggressive, I have said that you are rewarded hitting the rival, but if that is your answer, I'll not keep with the topic, I think knowing the next response.
Why?
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
A lot of random in the game!
The game engine should improve!
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
A lot of random in the game!
The game engine should improve!
Why is this weird? In the line up the Red team has a forward on the right side, but not on the left side. That explains the disparity right?
If you are losing, why on earth did you change two weaker players in the field? And twice...
Why did you go with normal to the second leg if you knew you need to win it? Why did you keep same tactics in it when it obviously didn't work at the first time?
And why your 22y CD is in NT when my 21y with same rat+better Qs isn't?
Why did you go with normal to the second leg if you knew you need to win it? Why did you keep same tactics in it when it obviously didn't work at the first time?
And why your 22y CD is in NT when my 21y with same rat+better Qs isn't?
I tuoi topic preferiti
Post piu recenti
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Tutti i diritti riservati
Contatti - Condizioni di Utilizzo - Norme sulla Privacy - Cookies settings - Mappa portale
Pubblicità su PowerPlay Manager - Diventa nostro partner!
Partner: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 102ms / php: 70ms / db: 32ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contatti - Condizioni di Utilizzo - Norme sulla Privacy - Cookies settings - Mappa portale
Pubblicità su PowerPlay Manager - Diventa nostro partner!
Partner: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 102ms / php: 70ms / db: 32ms ]
Web server: WB2