Ora:
Esci
Oggetto: Draft| Seleziona una nazione: |
|
Stati Uniti |
So what are you all thinking? Do you think the potential shown AFTER the player is drafted is more accurate than what you had when you scouted them? Or do you think it's just as wrong as anything else would be?
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I honestly have no expectations. Maybe my draftees will be great, maybe they'll bust. Who knows?
EDIT: Aww, he's missing an arm.
I honestly have no expectations. Maybe my draftees will be great, maybe they'll bust. Who knows?
EDIT: Aww, he's missing an arm.
The draft will be a bust. Im pretty sure nobody will get a 300 OR player. I hope they will get rid of it. I want to rely on my academy.
still doesnt mean much the showed potential.
I think it pretty much only helps to preventing drafting a C or D player that you scouted as chances a C player to be a good one is very slim and a D is for sure a bad one.
I think it pretty much only helps to preventing drafting a C or D player that you scouted as chances a C player to be a good one is very slim and a D is for sure a bad one.
I think the post draft grade is more accurate if you have good facilities. But the handball facilities probably aren't good enough to really be sure about the post draft grades either.
Wrong.
http://oi60.tinypic.com/2z3vxco.jpg
http://oi60.tinypic.com/2z3vxco.jpg
I'm actually pretty astounded by my draft.
Hopefully these guys turn out to be worth something.
In the draft, Wiley was scouted "A," but post draft was a "B" player. I didn't scout the other guy, but post draft, he was a "C" player.
Given their ratings after the draft was done, I was expecting 2-3 stars at best. Definitely a nice surprise.
Hopefully these guys turn out to be worth something.
In the draft, Wiley was scouted "A," but post draft was a "B" player. I didn't scout the other guy, but post draft, he was a "C" player.
Given their ratings after the draft was done, I was expecting 2-3 stars at best. Definitely a nice surprise.
Couture i see potential as 57. Wiley as 65. I wouldn't be that exited.
Two 15 year olds at around 300 OR in one week?
I'll be excited.
I'll be excited.
Thats what i get every week and i consider a bad pull unless there are super Q's like Luther Brunson .
D'okay one-upper.
What are good pulls? Is that, like, where you get good players from a regular weekly pulls? Does that happen?
But they were 4 stars. That has to be solid players at least, right? I'd be excited to see that.
And I see 55 and 74(Wiley).
And I see 55 and 74(Wiley).
vlady actually answered this question. They use different modifiers post draft, but it doesn't mean it's more accurate.
I tuoi topic preferiti
Post piu recenti
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Tutti i diritti riservati
Contatti - Condizioni di Utilizzo - Norme sulla Privacy - Cookies settings - Mappa portale
Pubblicità su PowerPlay Manager - Diventa nostro partner!
Partner: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 86ms / php: 72ms / db: 13ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contatti - Condizioni di Utilizzo - Norme sulla Privacy - Cookies settings - Mappa portale
Pubblicità su PowerPlay Manager - Diventa nostro partner!
Partner: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 86ms / php: 72ms / db: 13ms ]
Web server: WB2