Oggetto: Questions & Answers

I'm don't agree with your opinion
You can and i think . .. you should compare

Of course, older and bigger have advantage, this is fortunately normal (better sponsor, facilities, staff etc)

And when you start the game, you know this, it's normal ok.

But in addition to this, you give a bonus of the big team each day for viewing the ads.
It's just this fact that it is difficult to understand.

Now, i think understand well you And now i hope you understand my point of view lol

I agree with that, I'm a "new" club and I can't compare with those who play from the beginning even if it's a target to reach for some seasons; but I don't understand why an external game would bring more advantage to elite clubs.
In fact, I think I would understand easier if they offer better bonus for those who have an active account in Tennis duel.

Of course you "can" compare, but "should" you?

Is it right or realistic that WHL teams compare to NHL? Or Div 3 football teams to compare to Premier League?

I totally agree where you're coming from and I actually DO agree that PPM need to stop the rich teams getting even richer. But the daily login sum isn't the problem - the sponsor deals, and trading of players are MUCH bigger problems IMO.

Agree, that would be a far better idea. Activity on tennis duel would be the best way to deliver the bonus, not this way.

Anyway, 2am here, so bed time for me. Thanks for the discussion guys

4 622 689 today, after selling 4 players

811 842 players salaries
1 717 140 staff
526 962 aux
389 574 arena
1 177 171 (69 players on roster )

237 664 (TD bonus)

I know that difference presents huge amount of money for beginners, but why do they need to compare with anybody on this, especially with big teams ?
It's all relative. If they compare - it's huge. If I compare this bonus with my costs - it's misery.

All in all, I find it difficult to believe this fuss is about a little bonus that we got suddenly. You don't mind current economics, you don't want to come here in big numbers from France about really important stuff like whole economy of this game which needs to be revised and repaired. No, you seem to care more about one fragment that is sticking your eye like a needle - why oh why this old guy gets 600.000 per day ???
it is funny I must say

I am a pro user because I enjoy the game, but I don't think that we should get in game benefits over regular users. I do believe that I should get something for my money, but I want the site managers to ensure that there are a steady supply of regular users for me to play against. Decisions like this will make a few more people buy pro-packs and make a bunch more people leave the game.

I'll try to explain you with my very very good english. ^O^
So, Of course, for my team this bonus is not very important and it is not really the true problem.
But this is a substantive issue.

We speaks to the future of the game, for me it is important to keep perfect equity between the managers, this variable bonus is not a good think, it's an additional sponsor of 7% on the year, that falls the sky and give more advantage for the richer.

If I'm selfish, I would say that this bonus is a good thing, because with this bonus, i win 50 M by season, more than the most other French managers.
But I put myself in their place and i know many are disappointed to have another penalty against the best and, unlike you, don't find this funny at all.

I got you, but I think it's GS and media sponsor combined that matters most. Bonus is just derived from them, that is why we have so huge differences.

Ahhh ok so...

You really can't complain.

1) You CHOOSE to hire staff.
2) You CHOOSE to have a heavily overloaded roster and therefore pay the fine for that.

At the end of the day it's a manager game, if you don't like the $4mil + expenses, manage your team better. LOL

I never complained about the daily expenses. It is my choice I was just saying that the 0.23 M that I get daily from bonus is not a big factor in my finances. and yes, I'm reviewing the team strategy and intend to sell more then 20 players without a real future in my team. no staff though

Fair 'nuff

I would like to thank to all pro users that are paying for this game and make this game posible for all of us that dont want to pay a dime for online games. I dont worry about rich teams at all.

Once again, rich teams get an advantage - and nobody can explain why this is happening. If the goal is the make newer teams quit, why don't you just say so?

Technically, "rich teams" get no advantage, because everybody gets the same value based on their sponsor deals. At the core financial benefit, it's fair across the board. The problem isn't that it gives an advantage, it's that the sponsor deals its based on give an advantage.