Oggetto: Reporting bugs

Google is a scary company.
I'd prefer to spread out what information they are tracking me with.

I will do it for him:

A user reported that a penalize player still played the game even though he his supposed to be in the penalty box.

hockey.powerplaymanager.c...

Read second period play by play:

28:05 - Theron Aiken wins the faceoff. He sends the puck to Oldřich Čepák, who takes a shot from the right circle. Marcel Bazelya has no problems stopping the puck. He saw it all the way.

26:39 - Huge pile up in front of the les As goal. The puck gets to Seth Roberts through the traffic but he can't get the shot away as he was crosschecked by Theron Aiken. We have a delayed penalty as Theron Aiken takes control of the puck and fires it angrily to the other end of the rink and the whistle blows. Two minutes for Theron Aiken.

Not sure if this is a in the game engine or just in the text:

52:58 - Geoff Paquet avoids a check and slithers into the zone along the boards. He dumps it into the corner where it's picked up by Joe Parlour. He takes it around the net, backhands it across to Frank Holmes on the doorstep, a shot... hits the pipe! Rod Bingham picks up the loose change and the play is whistled down. Jake Whalen takes a penalty after leaving a knee in the path of Geoff Paquet. Great chance to score on a two-man advantage.

51:36 - Arnaud Palmer circles around the opposing net. He gets into a scoring chance but he is slashed by Len Campbell. The referee signals a delayed penalty and the The cKs goalie sprints towards the bench. Arnaud Palmer gets to the loose puck and sends it towards the net. Len Campbell blocks the shot and covers it up with his body. We have a stoppage of play and Len Campbell makes his way towards the penalty box.



At the bottom of 52:58 it says it was a great chance during the 2 man advantage, but that is when the penalty was called causing the 2 man advantage.

I'm not sure about this. It never says "It was a great chance to score", only "Great chance to score". It's grammatically vague. One could think of it as "This will be a great chance to score."

It this was real hockey, your team would have been up two-men with a 6-on-4 advantage by pulling the goalie, but I doubt that that happens in ppm.

It does happen in PPM, read the bottom of the two penalties.
The goalie goes to the bench for an extra attacker.

It didn't mention that in the top, which makes me wonder why it was a two-man advantage.

I figure it is probably just a grammatical error, but in the spirit of due diligence I just wanted to check.

like alex said. It is meant this way: "This will be a great chance to score..."

12:56 - They battle for it near the bench of Canadiens du Mont-Royal. Spenser Borges comes up with the puck. Rob Rose tries to check him and he pins him to the boards. He takes the puck and feeds it to Joshua Lyttle, who passes it to the streaking Lucas Nelson but the whistle blows. Rob Rose draws a penalty behind the play. Al Sanchez decided to avenge the hit on Spenser Borges. Roughing is the call and Vancouver Vanucks will get a chance on the power play.

Just saw this, I was wondering since Lucas Nelson (my team) had the puck when the other team was penalized, shouldn't play have continued until the penalized team gained possession of the puck instead of the play being blown dead immediately?

I don't think that my signing bonus discount was effective. I think I paid the full amount. I have screen shots to support.

Yup - definitely overpaid by 265,000.

What % is 265,000? What % signing bonus did they have?

It was a 10% signing bonus.

Requested signing bonus 1,590,000

Bonuses awarded 2
Signing bonus discount 10%
Compensation amount 1,325,000

Compensation actually paid: 1,590,000

I realize that 1,325,000 does not represent a 10% discount from 1,590,000. But neither does 1,590,000 represent a 10% discount from 2x 1,325,000.

None of these numbers add up...

I remember this being a tad confusing. You should have had to pay 70% less the discount, thus you should have had to pay 60% of the requested bonus... which is under 1M. Wait, was this RFA or UFA?

RFA. I checked the guide. This makes sense now.

The compensation amount of 1,325,000 is 50% of the offer sheet, which number wasn't displayed.

The requested signing bonus is 60% of the offer sheet.

Okay good. I guess I/we misinterpreted what numbers were which.