Suggestion: Tactical results needs a better layout. This normal/normal/normal/normal formatting is garbage. I suggest you set columns where under each quarter, the normal is below that. Just made a mini table with the results. It takes too much effort to figure out what tactic a team played in a given quarter.
In addition, everything about the basketball front end takes too much effort, the reading of text alone is brutal (may I suggest picking a stronger colour then a light shade or orange?)
Land auswählen: |
![]() |
International |
I actually prefer the way the match importance is displayed now.
I meant more than just match importance. I meant the entire tactics list. I'm used to looking at data tables. I'd rather be able to find what I'm interested in, and then look straight down to the row I want, rather than spend time searching for what I want.
I see your point now. Maybe it would indeed become more comfortable to find the info.
Finalist teams have a maximum of 9 wins for the playoffs while teams fighting against demotion have 14.
To avoid misdistribution of OTR we should give more OTR gain for playoff matches and that % should increase along with the importance of the match (ie 1/2 final more important than 5th-8th place fight).
As an alternative, we could give an OTR bonus (say, a regular season win OTR gain) whenever a team advances forward on the playoff fight for the title.
We must do that to avoid teams trying to benefit from lower performance on purpose.
To avoid misdistribution of OTR we should give more OTR gain for playoff matches and that % should increase along with the importance of the match (ie 1/2 final more important than 5th-8th place fight).
As an alternative, we could give an OTR bonus (say, a regular season win OTR gain) whenever a team advances forward on the playoff fight for the title.
We must do that to avoid teams trying to benefit from lower performance on purpose.
it would be good to also display height in inches in the player list/overview and in the line-up selection
disadvantage for playing 40 min in a game:
maybe it is an idea to give players disadvantage in a game when they play longer then 32 min for example. in real life it is almost not done to play all the game in Basketbal. there should be something like 8 min in a quarter they play normally and if they play more they will get a big disadvantage.
and then there is the prize money. the prizes will go to the players that will have the highest average in a game. so when they play 40 min they will have a higher average then players that play 32 min. think that is not good. maybe a standing by highest average per minute, and then you can set a minimum of minutes. or you can keep it like how it is now, but give the players that play longer then 32 min a big disadvantage so they will play less good in the next matches.
maybe it is an idea to give players disadvantage in a game when they play longer then 32 min for example. in real life it is almost not done to play all the game in Basketbal. there should be something like 8 min in a quarter they play normally and if they play more they will get a big disadvantage.
and then there is the prize money. the prizes will go to the players that will have the highest average in a game. so when they play 40 min they will have a higher average then players that play 32 min. think that is not good. maybe a standing by highest average per minute, and then you can set a minimum of minutes. or you can keep it like how it is now, but give the players that play longer then 32 min a big disadvantage so they will play less good in the next matches.
What about "League Cup" in Basketball, like in Football...for example last 4-5 days of season...there is more free days, without official matches...You can use "Final league ranking".
Have an option to display height in inches or centimeters. Simple option but I'm sure many would enjoy it
Maps of countries not using the metric system (in red): upload.wikimedia.org/wiki...
I'm not sure this qualifies as many.
I'm not sure this qualifies as many.
Basically only the USA. Though Canada still uses it for height and weight of people mostly.
Deine favorisierten Themen
Neueste Beiträge