Well try to put some mid without attack at AMC position - he will be in offensive action too (and he will shoot at goal).
It's not in training - it's in position on the field.
Land auswählen: | International |
He was injured 16 days and look at my results without him. My opinion is that it´s importnant. Maybe it´s just for me but I saw differences when I had to put up the other guy to my line-up.
I would really love that's the case.
Looks like your other guy getting lower rating. Sometimes results depends on luck, opponent, tactic (your vs opponent), ...
If Vlady statement is true: "Ratings suppose to show us how good player is trained for position he played at" - than AMC with 100 on mid doesn't need more than 25 offense (maybe even 20 is enough). - and that's something I don't like
Looks like your other guy getting lower rating. Sometimes results depends on luck, opponent, tactic (your vs opponent), ...
If Vlady statement is true: "Ratings suppose to show us how good player is trained for position he played at" - than AMC with 100 on mid doesn't need more than 25 offense (maybe even 20 is enough). - and that's something I don't like
Either of us have different opinion. After 2-3 seasons we will see.
Deine favorisierten Themen
Neueste Beiträge