Избери страна: |
![]() |
САЩ |
Ah, I see, I did misunderstand.
I think they spend 10M$ :/
I think they spend 10M$ :/
I'd like to see line matching put into the tactic section of the game for the home team. This is akin to "last change" in actual hockey and would add a extra layer for managers in developing line combinations.
A corollary addition to prevent a 100% line match system would be the ability to assign ice time for lines either through total ice time or shift time per line. This way a visiting team would be able to somewhat avoid having their 1st line match up against the home teams, say defensive 3rd line for every single shift.
I'm sure this has all been suggested previously but I think it would add quite a bit of tactical depth to the game.
A corollary addition to prevent a 100% line match system would be the ability to assign ice time for lines either through total ice time or shift time per line. This way a visiting team would be able to somewhat avoid having their 1st line match up against the home teams, say defensive 3rd line for every single shift.
I'm sure this has all been suggested previously but I think it would add quite a bit of tactical depth to the game.
I think what you have done with football, with Pitch Quality is simply brilliant. I would strongly recommend having something like that for hockey, calling it Ice Quality.
I mean, we know all ice is not equal. Here at Madison Square Garden, the ice is not as good.
I agree with you and wouldn't doubt that they go back and put that in at the end of this season or next depending on the reaction is soccer/football
i would just like it if i didnt have to sign in each time i visit the site. thehy need a "remember me" box so the site will keep you logged in at least a day at a time.
most browsers have an autocomplete feature and password memory so all you have to do is hit the login button.
What is the theory behind teams being allowed to borrow more money at the same interest rates as they progress season to season?
It seems to me it allows the teams at the top of the ladder to finance their activities cheaper than those just beginning.
It seems to me it allows the teams at the top of the ladder to finance their activities cheaper than those just beginning.
The game always benefits those at the top, in almost every aspect of the game involving money.. it's a point of anger and frustration for many of us.
It really only lets you start your facilities a few weeks earlier. So instead of saving 4 or 5 weeks, before starting an upgrade, you can borrow the money. Newer clubs can finance an upgrade out of weekly income.
That and even though the interest rate is the same the larger the loan the more they are paying in interest.
I think maybe an interesting pro pack feature for the market, a "Market assistant" would be cool. then i could set a max price I want to pay for a player and it would keep bidding on that player for me up to that max amount. If you run out of money, it stops bidding, or it sets aside the "max" amount you specified.
I know for me I would much rather just set a price and let it go, kind of like how Ebay works now, and might be a nice perk to help attract pro users.
I know for me I would much rather just set a price and let it go, kind of like how Ebay works now, and might be a nice perk to help attract pro users.
Твоите любими теми
Най-нови мнения