Hmm, thinking about it. Not as impressive, but still decent other prospect from the same pull,
Connor Cake
Qs are 66,97,97,86,85,69,60. SG height,but only 5/6 CL
Selecciona un país: |
![]() |
Canadá |
I'm looking for at least 400OR 15yo players for the moment, but maybe for an other season if he improves fast.
He's my pick if no prospect comes from an academy soon. He could be too tall if he grows too much, but he's good enough.
All quite valid, but which six players will we have to fill the PF and C positions next season? Even the best of guards make poor forwards which are the positions we find most difficult to fill season after season.
https://prnt.sc/geah5q
Pretty good PF for the future. Just sad I didn't get him in the beginning of the season.
Pretty good PF for the future. Just sad I didn't get him in the beginning of the season.
Canada...78
Russia...82
Great outing for a team that had a 9 point deficit in team strength! If our starting centre had not fouled out before half time, or if we had a better replacement for him, we might have pulled off the upset. Unfortunately, there is shortage of good tall men in this age bracket. Nonetheless, great work!
Russia...82
Great outing for a team that had a 9 point deficit in team strength! If our starting centre had not fouled out before half time, or if we had a better replacement for him, we might have pulled off the upset. Unfortunately, there is shortage of good tall men in this age bracket. Nonetheless, great work!
Yeah but I think it's over for the Q. We play Romania away next and they are way better. I'll probably change to 15-16 years old tomorrow with the exception of Waktins, Powell and Parkin.
The current 16 gens looks good. Top player are worst than the 17yo gen, but the roles are balanced. We won't get any big prospect from the 16yo gen (except St.Amour), but we will get a more competitive team IMO.
The current 16 gens looks good. Top player are worst than the 17yo gen, but the roles are balanced. We won't get any big prospect from the 16yo gen (except St.Amour), but we will get a more competitive team IMO.
The following 18 players look good for next season:
All have been scouted and show well.
Five of them are 15 yr olds.
Canada Brannon Garcia
Canada Trevor Dionne
Canada Auston Kavanagh
Canada Phillip Earl
Canada Clay Goldsmith
Canada Axel Osborn
Canada Donald Alcott
Canada Mike McDougall
Canada Roman Fillion
Canada Jackson Stanley
Canada Landyn Mullins
Canada Curt Steele
Canada Carlos Nealon
Canada Christoper Weston
Canada Tod Charbonneau
Canada Jason Ford
Canada Harvey King
Canada Lowell Bonneville
Bobby Jay
U19 GM Canada
All have been scouted and show well.
Five of them are 15 yr olds.
Canada Brannon Garcia
Canada Trevor Dionne
Canada Auston Kavanagh
Canada Phillip Earl
Canada Clay Goldsmith
Canada Axel Osborn
Canada Donald Alcott
Canada Mike McDougall
Canada Roman Fillion
Canada Jackson Stanley
Canada Landyn Mullins
Canada Curt Steele
Canada Carlos Nealon
Canada Christoper Weston
Canada Tod Charbonneau
Canada Jason Ford
Canada Harvey King
Canada Lowell Bonneville
Bobby Jay
U19 GM Canada
Curt Steele, basketball player by day, pornstar by night.
There's only 12 players on the team, shouldn't some more have been added so that they would get the benefit of the training bonus?
The game allows you to call up 25.
My recommendation:
17 year olds
2..PG
2..SG
3..SF
3..PF
3..C
Thus gives you starting line-up that allows for foul outs or injury at the most likely positions.
and
under 17:
2..PG
2..SG
2..SF
2..PF
2..C
This allows for a starting line-up of youngsters in the event that qualification is not achieved. They can be started in order to built experience and chemistry for the following season.
This gives a total of 23, leaving 2 spots open for newly discovered talent.
If the under 17's are more talented than the 17's, I would use them instead.
My recommendation:
17 year olds
2..PG
2..SG
3..SF
3..PF
3..C
Thus gives you starting line-up that allows for foul outs or injury at the most likely positions.
and
under 17:
2..PG
2..SG
2..SF
2..PF
2..C
This allows for a starting line-up of youngsters in the event that qualification is not achieved. They can be started in order to built experience and chemistry for the following season.
This gives a total of 23, leaving 2 spots open for newly discovered talent.
If the under 17's are more talented than the 17's, I would use them instead.
To the next U17 GM:
I have a list of
32 16year olds
and
16 15year olds
most of who have already been scouted.
I am willing to share this info with you if you think you would find it helpful.
I have a list of
32 16year olds
and
16 15year olds
most of who have already been scouted.
I am willing to share this info with you if you think you would find it helpful.
This make lot of sense. This is how I built it in the past. This is frustrating to only wee four 16y in the team. Others needs to get bonus too, but more we need at least 5 to not forfeit the first game next year before the new GM is in and get chemistry from those games.
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios