Selecciona un país: |
![]() |
Internacional |
ok thanks
I think just CL are important, age is separate of training influence (because players with same CL and different age have similar training )
I think just CL are important, age is separate of training influence (because players with same CL and different age have similar training )
Not true at all. 22yo 5/6 80Q does NOT train the same as 19 5/6 80Q. In fact, I have 17 4/6 90Q training better than 21 5/6 90Q. I would argue age impacts more than C/L.
I'm going to write a PPM Mag article next month on this, complete with data analysis and everything.
Couple of months ago I've found out that there are even sub levels (as Vlady called them) in players CL, so you could have a player with same age, same quality, same CL, but one that had drop in CL recently trains better than player who was with that same CL longer.
ok thanks
If you're are OK, I think to ask at a french traducteur to traduce it when this article will be published
If you're are OK, I think to ask at a french traducteur to traduce it when this article will be published

I have (or had) two players to back that up, if Vlady's word isn't good enough

yes, the sub levels was explain on a article mag in season 4
ppm.powerplaymanager.com/...
I think it is not perfect but that make a good idea of sub levels
and justly, it's because that I think same LC for a player is not a pledge of equality, because same CL could have different sub level (and by extension, difference in training)
ppm.powerplaymanager.com/...
I think it is not perfect but that make a good idea of sub levels
and justly, it's because that I think same LC for a player is not a pledge of equality, because same CL could have different sub level (and by extension, difference in training)
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios