Asunto: Questions & Answers

I've seen a difference when upgrading my regen but the difference isn't huge. I think only the best teams of 1st division can make profit with the 15th level of regeneration facility. The influence of the facility is low compared to training facility. Take of your fysio's and you'll see that the facility with its employees have an influence on training.

I was going to do that just for one day to measure it. Anyway, got a feeling that I would be just as good with 13th level, and that fact is getting on my nerves.
I could do HR or SA instead.

LOL... SA

a bit more LOL on RF

Maybe, but how long did you measure the RF difference?
League games have more drain than friendlies.

Few days before upgrade:
2011-12-24 1.455 -0.001
2011-12-23 1.456 -0.028
2011-12-22 1.484 -0.013
2011-12-21 1.497 +0.014
2011-12-20 1.483 +0.020
2011-12-19 1.463 -0.020
2011-12-18 1.483 +0.018

After upgrade:
2011-12-29 1.444 +0.004
2011-12-28 1.440 -0.010
2011-12-27 1.450 -0.021
2011-12-26 1.471 -0.039

25th was NT day training, had 5 players in NT and 1,510.
What is obvious, is that second decimal rarely went to 5 this month on level 13, I had more cases when it was 7 or 8, even 9. But now it has very bad streak 2 times on 4, and I just don't get it.
Just to make it clear, I didn't expect huge impact as for training facility, and I know this is 5 day measurement, but still makes you think whether it was right thing to do.

In the past there has been rumours that the ratio between Sports Academy level and Trainung Facility level is important to pull good prospects and the ratio between the levels of Regeneration and Training facilities has some influence on the player's career longetivity. If there is some truth to the latter you may have taken a good decision after all.

You should look at strictly players who played. Players who didn't play will likely saturate the numbers considering you'll have ~50% of your team playing on any given day.

really?! if there is just some little truth in this rumours then this has to be written in the rules! And if it's not written there, then this is just a rumour and not true. and if it's true, then it's a big mistake in my opinion!

Like I said, I have no idea if there is any truth to it. It could very well be nonsense. I don't even remember where I read it.

So....those that didn't play had incredible low random training for 5 days ? Doesn't make any sense.

@Knuckle I wish that was true, but it isn't. I had always 1 level of difference between TF and RF, but some seasons my CL drop was normal, some was awful.

I hear what you're saying. I just hope that was a fluke. I've invested SO MUCH into regen facilities in each sport

I hope too. Didn't used to watch newly build objects to behave like they were torn down.

with WCH on the verge, what energy are we using for hockey NT's ? current player energy or a separate one (I see 100/100 at every single one) and at other pages I see current playerenergy ...

I need this to be absolutely clear for me to have my final selection for WCH!!!

the NT energy. doesn't necessarily have to be 100 because of the games played during the season.