Asunto: Questions & Answers

sure, no problem, but no need to use such language (last word)

ok, now I'll be more polited and I say:

bulls excrement

I'm glad that you can so easily find errors in the game engine.

You dont need to be a genius to find such banal errors, statistics detect it

47 defenders and only 3 atackers are in top 50 penalty minutes in leauge

not that much difference here in Belgium, top division:

42 defenders, 8 attackers

Here is your explanation - Defenders need Passing and Agg, but do not "require" tech - silly managers neglect tech or just raise it to the minimum needed, creating unbalanced penalty machines.

Centers do not require Agg so no one really trains it.

Wingers require Tech and Agg, most people train these equally or with tech slightly ahead, making these players a LOT less likely to take a penalty.

It is not the game engines fault that the penalties occur, but the tendencies of managers to train the "best" player builds.

Think of things logically instead of screaming about bovine fecal matter.

That is the only right answer!

28-22 isnt big diference but 42-8 still to much unbalanced and far from reality

that isnt in game guide, it said that technique isnt secondary skill and shuldnt be in same level as passing and aggresion

Aggressiveness: ... bla-bla-bla... However, it also has a down side. Players with high aggressiveness rating and poor technique are often penalized.

this is reality, 24 of 30 top penalized players are atackers

http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/s tats/leaders/postseason/yearly /PIM/NHL?tag=pageContainer;all

lot of teams play with 6 defenders and 12 atackers so atackers have more penalties but in this game is nonsense

if everything is in the game guide then you cna't really call it a manager game right?

you have to find out things. that what you suppose to do if you wanna be a good manager.

defenders have to train extra technique while centers and wingers need to train more shooting, so offcourse you cannot only train your main and the two Secondaries.

Premium, ofcourse tech is needed,

but take a look at your league, I can tell most of you guys train decently (more than here in Belgium) and 42vs8 (same as us Belgians) is pretty big gap between defenders and attackers, no ?!

i think u undrestad well what i wanna say but you pretend to be unintelligent to defend game makers

game makers just have to declare technique as third secondary skill and problem is resolved, it is obvius that technique shouldnt be lower than agression and it isnt some additional skill

we just had a confersation about this in the swiss forum.

There some teams (like klosters city dragons firs Div)
where got wreally less penalltys cause of training the players right.

he got non player whit less tec the agr.

in my case ist it the same .
my first line got in the total around 60 points more tec then agr
second third and fourd line are around 50 point more in tec as in agr and it works well.