Selecciona un país: |
![]() |
Internacional |
next season, can your team compete in the CWC/CL AND the Super league cup? 2 international tournaments?
Nope. The priority have CL, than CWC and SLC is at the bottom when comes to priorities..
I thought I read SL would be played on Saturday, wouldn't it? In that case what would prevent playing in both SL and CL at the same time?
Each league champion already got the well deserved trophy. Runner-ups still waiting for a chance to proudly celebrate and show their prize. Would you know when will they get awarded?
You mean promotion pairs?
X.1,5,9,... plays with 18.
X.2,6,10,... plays with 17.
X.3,7,11,... plays with 16.
X.4,8,12,... plays with 15.
2. in III.7 plays with 16. from II.2
X.1,5,9,... plays with 18.
X.2,6,10,... plays with 17.
X.3,7,11,... plays with 16.
X.4,8,12,... plays with 15.
2. in III.7 plays with 16. from II.2
That's exactly what i wanted to know, thanks.
On the other hand it sounds kinda unfair if you ask me, why does the "X.4,8,12"
like me) get the "hardest" opponents?
It would be more fair if it was done by league OTR if you ask me...
On the other hand it sounds kinda unfair if you ask me, why does the "X.4,8,12"

It would be more fair if it was done by league OTR if you ask me...
"In the new engine the illogical formations will be more heavily penalized. We will not publish any numbers on how you should play, but the general knowledge of the sport of football will be enough for you to know which formations are good and which are not so good. Of course we have left some room to manouver here and you still have plenty of options how to set up your team."
Sorry, but this is not enough: penalizations, will be according only to the number of players per line -Def, Mid, For-? Are formations like 4-2-4, 5-5-0, 2-5-3, 5-2-3 adequate? Does not it matter if they are like offensive or defensive? And how many players, under this "general knowledge", can play at the most on any of the sides -Left/Center/Right-? And at the least?
Too many open questions...
Sorry, but this is not enough: penalizations, will be according only to the number of players per line -Def, Mid, For-? Are formations like 4-2-4, 5-5-0, 2-5-3, 5-2-3 adequate? Does not it matter if they are like offensive or defensive? And how many players, under this "general knowledge", can play at the most on any of the sides -Left/Center/Right-? And at the least?
Too many open questions...

"Does not it matter if they are like offensive or defensive?" I meant "they", the players, inside each zone...
It´s gonna be up to us to figure it out. It seems that was just a warning for the heterodox formation managers.
I wouldn't care to figure it out, if we could see that penalization somewhere; for example, in players ratings, in matches report; or in team strenght... Otherwise, from where we can get it?
There are already loads of non-measurable factors -al least by us, users- working inside the ME: tactics, formations, positions inside zones; energy, experience, preferred side, chemistry of players...
We need some more explanations about all this. Or ways to make some calculations, from the info the game provides us... wherever.
There are already loads of non-measurable factors -al least by us, users- working inside the ME: tactics, formations, positions inside zones; energy, experience, preferred side, chemistry of players...
We need some more explanations about all this. Or ways to make some calculations, from the info the game provides us... wherever.
"Otherwise, from where we can get it? "
In the results. It's always the best way to measure the effectiveness of any tactics.
In the results. It's always the best way to measure the effectiveness of any tactics.
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios