Selecciona un país: | Internacional |
So there i was, just wondering what the biggest capacity arena is, anyone know?? its just me being curious.
give me just over a month and ill have 5200 - it just takes so long to build a triple level.
Shui Xian will have 4700 in 17 days
There are a few teams with 3600 atm.
Take a look at the top-games page and check out the teams with the top attendances.
Shui Xian will have 4700 in 17 days
There are a few teams with 3600 atm.
Take a look at the top-games page and check out the teams with the top attendances.
What do you think about your cost on a season level for these stands? Is it worth it yet ?
it actually takes less time compared to lower level stands to pay back the bigger stands based on costs/number of people they hold.
Thus as long as you dont completely overbuild then should be good. As i already fill my stadium, should hopefully do ok with the new stand as well.
Thus as long as you dont completely overbuild then should be good. As i already fill my stadium, should hopefully do ok with the new stand as well.
not much...i have one contract about 1,3 mill and one about 800k ...that is money for whole season...so somewhere about 70k each week...
Finally got started on my arena work.... 11 days into my first Triple-floor multifunctional... damn, it's expensive!!
This is utter bull. We've just made calculations regarding the stands and as it happens, building 8 small stand-up stands gives you more money in the short and long run than building 8 small with seats.
And the reason for this is, that the ticket price is exactly the same for both of them, but the maintenance costs are a lot bigger for the seated ones.
I think this is a huge flaw in the current system and hopefully the admins will take a look at this.
My friend will provide the calculations to back this up. But we already know the ticket prices don't change, so there already is a problem that should be looked at.
And the reason for this is, that the ticket price is exactly the same for both of them, but the maintenance costs are a lot bigger for the seated ones.
I think this is a huge flaw in the current system and hopefully the admins will take a look at this.
My friend will provide the calculations to back this up. But we already know the ticket prices don't change, so there already is a problem that should be looked at.
Take a closer look at it. The calculation is not that simple, e.g. higher level of stands attracts more people, success of the team is also very important for attendance.
The calculations were done by expecting full crowds in every game.
And that is exactly the problem in your calculation. How many people will show up if they have to stand for the whole game? Not many. People want to sit while watching a game. The ccupancy rate will be higher will the level of your stands.
What is the problem? Don't you find it odd that you'll make more money with stand-up stands than with seated stands to begin with? Are you serious?
With a successful team you will make more money with seated stands than with standup-stands. With a weak team you will loose more money with the seated stands than with stand-up stands.
The point of the calculations were to look at the maximum possible income, which you don't seem to understand.
The maximum possible income of 8 small stand-up stands is more than with 8 small seated stands.
Now tell me, do you not find that odd?
The maximum possible income of 8 small stand-up stands is more than with 8 small seated stands.
Now tell me, do you not find that odd?
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios