Tiempo:
Salir
Asunto: Team Canada Hockey
. Only 50% surprised one of my goalies didn't make it. Oh well. I won't have to worry about conserving their energy. That was one thing last season. I played Newts all the time (60-70% of league games) and Garnett had 99% energy heading into the WHC tourney. When you pick guys who are the only go-to on a club they'll be down to 80-85% energy come the end of playoffs. Just something to keep in mind. Not trying to pump my own tires but I think I am one of a few teams who actually has and uses the luxury of 2 solid goalies.
| Selecciona un país: |
|
Canada |
Cool. I still have one NT player . Only 50% surprised one of my goalies didn't make it. Oh well. I won't have to worry about conserving their energy. That was one thing last season. I played Newts all the time (60-70% of league games) and Garnett had 99% energy heading into the WHC tourney. When you pick guys who are the only go-to on a club they'll be down to 80-85% energy come the end of playoffs. Just something to keep in mind. Not trying to pump my own tires but I think I am one of a few teams who actually has and uses the luxury of 2 solid goalies.
. Only 50% surprised one of my goalies didn't make it. Oh well. I won't have to worry about conserving their energy. That was one thing last season. I played Newts all the time (60-70% of league games) and Garnett had 99% energy heading into the WHC tourney. When you pick guys who are the only go-to on a club they'll be down to 80-85% energy come the end of playoffs. Just something to keep in mind. Not trying to pump my own tires but I think I am one of a few teams who actually has and uses the luxury of 2 solid goalies.
A lot of work, it seems. Good job though. And good luck to Team Canada!
I have/use two solid goalies, except since mine have only reached prospect status, I'm not too worried about saving energy of Rowan Craig.
Lol are you serious..
So you're telling me you'd choose player A over B when
A: 16yrs old 438OR 6/6 longevity (quality 99-99-99-87)
B: 15yrs old 400OR 6/6 longevity (quality 99-86-87-99)
You obviously know something I don't, that's why you're the manager.
And the beauty of being the manager is you still have the last say.
Good Luck
So you're telling me you'd choose player A over B when
A: 16yrs old 438OR 6/6 longevity (quality 99-99-99-87)
B: 15yrs old 400OR 6/6 longevity (quality 99-86-87-99)
You obviously know something I don't, that's why you're the manager.
And the beauty of being the manager is you still have the last say.
Good Luck
I'd choose the player A too. But I'm stuck in the league II.3 and you're in the 1.1. Maybe this explains that...
I also would take player A over player B. Qs are way better and the CLs are the same.
You can only guess who will drop to 5/6 first cause its random
You can only guess who will drop to 5/6 first cause its random
lol okay
i suppose im the one who needs work
i suppose im the one who needs work
at least you have player B, my players would be more like player Gs and Hs
I would choose B. The main difference here is 15yrs old vs 16yrs old.
From Team Canada's perspective, B will be a better player than A. By the time B gets to age 16, he will have AT LEAST 520OR (vs A which is age 16 and ONLY 430 OR).
From Team Canada's perspective, B will be a better player than A. By the time B gets to age 16, he will have AT LEAST 520OR (vs A which is age 16 and ONLY 430 OR).
But B will probably always be better than A unless A's CL stays up for longer than B's
I like both of their chances at being on the U20 team whenever that happens.
Exactly B will always be better than A
Thanks for those who came out to take a side, regardless of right or wrong.
This, by all means, does not mean I'm questioning saltyanchovy's efforts. I'm just merely stating there have been a mistake.
If Luc Hickey gets included in due time, we can all just leave it at that.
This, by all means, does not mean I'm questioning saltyanchovy's efforts. I'm just merely stating there have been a mistake.
If Luc Hickey gets included in due time, we can all just leave it at that.
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Todos los derechos reservados
Contacto - Términos de Servicio - Políticas de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del portal
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Conviértete en nuestro socio!
Compañeros: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 119ms / php: 71ms / db: 48ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contacto - Términos de Servicio - Políticas de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del portal
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Conviértete en nuestro socio!
Compañeros: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 119ms / php: 71ms / db: 48ms ]
Web server: WB2