选择一个国家: |
![]() |
国际 |
Calculation of the players' match ratings also includes chemistry. Nevertheless they are high.
I understand that could forget something to consider. Therefore I ask about a bug. If strength of NT is displayed correctly, it is necessary to think once more.

True, it does. But chemistry in NT at the moment is between 0 and around 5 (depends on how much chem players gain in a match), while in the club chemistry should be around 100.
This results in player having a little bit higher rating in club than in NT.(If players match rating in club or NT is equal, that should be atributed to players club energy.)
I dont see anything wrong with NT strentgh or players match ratings.
That or I'm not getting what you are saying
This results in player having a little bit higher rating in club than in NT.(If players match rating in club or NT is equal, that should be atributed to players club energy.)
I dont see anything wrong with NT strentgh or players match ratings.
That or I'm not getting what you are saying

The more ratings of players, the more strength of team. Do you agree? You don't find strange that the ratings of players in NT are approximately at the level of the best clubs, but the strength of the NT is much less strength of these clubs?)
Is there any rules according to which player is selected to all star team of the day? Because sometimes it seems, that selection isn't correct if you start calculating players effectiveness.
does anyone know what the hidden gems in the player drafts really mean? Does it mean they have a potential of A or A+, but will always appear to clubs as a B or lower, regardless of their scouting/HR?
thanks
thanks
One of finnish managers drafted one in ice hockey in the last draft. Aka they do exist, If that is the question.
I've seen many in hockey, but have never seen one in basketball
The question was more to find out, how strong such hidden gems would be in terms of avg quality and strength and how they "look like" to maximize my chances to draft one


你喜欢的游戏主题
最新主题