主题: Reporting bugs

Can't see anything good in ruining the game now because of one future change.
The squad of the daytrading teams is already exploding again.

Exactly. That's the problem I'm most concerned about. Maybe it's just me, but I don't wont this to become just another buy-cheap-sell-expensive game. Daytraders are already dominating the game and these changes will help them to become even stronger. With planned free agent market, they will easily outbid every player they want.
Paying 2.3% of sponsors donations for player salaries is a nonsense, no matter what the future will be.

I can already see certain manager(s) buying a lot, with 55+ players already in their team(s). I've heard some of them are close to the developers, so I wonder if there "calculations" and changes were not their idea.

No.1 daytrader from Slovak first league purchased immediately 6 new players!

Well, another mistery for me:
Player name: Janko Pungaršek
Current salary: 892
Expected salary: 891

I guess he's a bit worse today than he was yesterday. Why?

Yep, day traders are pest. Also selling garbage players with only primary skill 100+ and the rest above 30 are in the same basket. I guess I would stop playing when realize that I just throw away a lot of money for nothing..

Best way to decrease daytrading is to just increase sales taxes progressively. For example:

11-20 sold players in 112 days = +2% per sold player i.e. player 11 = 7% taxes, player 20 = 25% taxes (like nowadays)

21-30 sold players = +4% per sold player i.e. player 21 = 29% taxes, player 30 = 65% taxes.

31+ = +6% per sold player i.e. player 71% taxes, player 34 = 89% taxes.

Maximum taxes could be for example to 89%.

Also great method is to increase significantly fees to teams with rosters bigger than 40 players. At least now when players salaries are very small. Maybe progressive fee might be good solution. For example:

41-45 players = 15% fee of combined salaries of all players.

46-50 players = 25% fee

51-55 players = 35% fee

56-60 players = 45% fee etc.

for sure they need to come up with a solution to stop slow down daytrading, or make it very hard to do (with extra costs liks proposed)

hope something like this will be implemented as well, it's a necessity!!!

Another solution might be to decrease training for rosters bigger than 40 players. About -2% training per player over 40.

To avoid 50-day-trading I would prefer higher wages. I am a 50-day-trader. I know what I mean. I reduced my speculative moves as long as the wages went up, because it did not pay to have such a high daily burden on extra players with 50% discount on selling. Now, with the burden brought down to 1/3 of what it was, it pays off again. Prices in the market will go up as a consequence of lower wages, and along with this, variance between prices paid to same level players. And, as a consequence, also 50-day-trading tends to increase.

But, above all, I dislike a changing-rules environment. It opens breaches to pure speculative moves and to bad use of privileged information.

Ahh... I can see that now. Now the 5* offer I have is only 200k less then the 4* offer I had.

I would really like to know, why the salaries recalculated today are smaller than yesterday. Did the formula change a bit in between or what? I hope the energy does not affect the salary, because that's the only thing that has lowered since yesterday. I have another example in my team:

The team management has signed a new contract with the player.
Player name Matevž Beravs
Contract duration 112
Previous salary 609
Current salary 606

I don't know but I have a guess. Random maybe?

ok, thanks. I wrote it to tuttle. tomorrow will probably be news about it.

It's good, because formula for salary was changed. You'll need a lot of money for RFA and second thing is that salary will increase faster than in the past.