Час:
Вийти
Тема: Questions & Answers
I have only 17 players staying at home during training camp, so I'm wondering: is it possible in any way to choose which player will return from a training camp in case of an injury of one of the players that should play the game that day?
I just can't find how to do this and I don't want the computer to randomly pick a player every time that this happens. Thanks!
| Виберіть країну: |
|
Міжнародна секція |
you cant choose one. best solution - buy anything for 10k and after camp fire him
take one of your latest youth players that you did not pull
a huge flaw (omission) in the draft, teams that have changed league not choose anywhere!
I never understood why is team that wins the league punished with the lowest star offer possible?
Why isn't a champion rewarded automatically with offers at least 3*? He had done good job, and he should be rewarded for that!
I know I might finish 10th next season and I still might get 5* offer.. and it balances. But is it really balanced? I loose much more with 1* champion-offer, than I would gain with 5* middle-of-the-table-offer. It doesnt make sense, it seems like a punishment.
Thanks for explanation
Why isn't a champion rewarded automatically with offers at least 3*? He had done good job, and he should be rewarded for that!
I know I might finish 10th next season and I still might get 5* offer.. and it balances. But is it really balanced? I loose much more with 1* champion-offer, than I would gain with 5* middle-of-the-table-offer. It doesnt make sense, it seems like a punishment.
Thanks for explanation
Beavuse it's completly random. If you want a minimum offer for top teams, than there must be an opposit for low-performers.
Make it random for low performers and make it minimum 3* for champions (not top teams!).
Why the champ shall have a bonus against the 2nd placed? It would open the gap between the upper and lower teams even more
How is this a bonus? I think its more like a reward for a job well done!
Why should a champion be punished with 1* offer, when he did everything right, while someone finished 10th - and lets say he did terrible - and is rewarded with 5*?
Why should a champion be punished with 1* offer, when he did everything right, while someone finished 10th - and lets say he did terrible - and is rewarded with 5*?
That's life with randomness. My team promoted and got only two star offers for main sponsor. Was bad luck...
I can't accept that, I'm sorry. Its stupid and unfair.
1* offer for team finishing 1st is automatically better than if they had finished 2nd. I see no problem there...
Is it possible that a player is falling on 4/6 with 21 if he had 6/6 with 17 years? Bug?
I believe it is possible. A player (as far as I know) can not drop the following season, but can drop with two years apart. So if he droped to 5/6 as 19, he could drop to 4/6 at 21.
Hmm sure?! I have never seen this before. Every player who droped with 17y droped also with 22y and not with 21 or 20 years. I still belive its a bug
Обрані теми
Нові повідомлення
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Усі права захищені
Контакт - Ліцензійна угода - Політика конфіденційності - Cookies settings - Мапа порталу
Реклама на PowerPlay Manager - Станьте нашим партнером!
Партнери: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 97ms / php: 64ms / db: 33ms ]
Web server: WB2
Контакт - Ліцензійна угода - Політика конфіденційності - Cookies settings - Мапа порталу
Реклама на PowerPlay Manager - Станьте нашим партнером!
Партнери: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 97ms / php: 64ms / db: 33ms ]
Web server: WB2