主題: Questions & Answers

Yeah, capice. But maybe you ask the better questions (concerning the distributions), who knows. Thats always important in statistics.
Anyway, to conclude, if you want to make a point it's good to have evidence. And singled out games are imho no good evidence.

Was your opinion compromised when you were part of PPM Team?

If we want a serious discussion of the subject we should start by defining objective values and stop talking about "too much upsets"

What should be the correct ratio?

What? Where did I say that?

Have everyone looked at the chemistry and Energy of the players in the "weird" matches ?

In my opinion it looks like a team easy gets a goal in his own net if the energy is too low...

Whatever the rate is on the individual player in the matchreport !

Again to conclude, since with that comment I kind of feel that you are not taking me serious. I would not utter an opinion here if it wasn't my own. Period! Singled out games don't show much in a game of chances. Period.

Just a joke man, take it easy. But if the cap fits, please feel free to wear it.

That is one of the correct points in the actual simulator in my opinion.

Low energy means very bad performance, even if the chemestry is good. In this situation a weak team could win against a strong team, despite these adjectives being very vague.
But to win in a balanced game.

Now the actual scenario:
Stronger team has 70 (or less) energy.
Weaker team has 90 (or more) energy.
Stronger team does 15 goal attempts!!! => here is the problem
Weaker team does 3 goal attemps!!! => here is another problem

Weaker team wins by 1 x 0. => result is ok if we consider the energy. But what about the shots?

This of course, is my opinion.

Sorry folk, but my general opinion is different than yours and I will keep it. About he single game analysis, who did that? Not me.

All mods have to do now is lower shots for favourite in "weird mach".

For a guy that like maths and statistics a lot (at least you speak a lot about it), i expected to see you giving us some numbers...

I expected something like "I have a different opinion about this subject because I think the number of upsets for such different number of shots, ball possetion, etc should be X% and in PPM it is Y%.."

He Is correct, the purpose of a sports simulator Is to simulate events as accurate to real life as it can.

And err... Didn't you bring up the topic of a simulator?

Agreed. Need evidence that "weaker" teams can win big games... Wigan Athletic won the Fa Cup this year. A button team beat some much better teams to do it, too.

Button team = bottom team. Damn autocorrect.

I am just a customer right now my friend, maybe I do like math, maybe not, but I am certainly not the one who has to run the numbers. After all I am saying that to help PPM, not to challenge PPM.

You should check by that ppm want help first, otherwise it doesn't come across as helping, it comes over as continuously whining about how You feel the system is wrong.