主題: Suggestions

+1

You really have to do something about Line Up page as far as defensive tactic is concerned...especially when we have tactical changes involved during match...
It's Kinda annoying going back and forth to next game page to check players positions...

I don't know maybe a simple rolling list with 6-0, 5-1, 4-2, 3-2-1 would be nice to make it easier for us...

Thank you

I would like to see Time Played on each individual stat page. It is already tracked for each game, so it should be easy to implement. I hate seeing a guy get credit for playing a game when he only gets a minute or two of actual playing time.

More choices for changing the goalie. I might want to pull my first goalie if I'm ahead with 10 goals last 10-15 minutes to save energy.

Why not include the goalie in the formations?

Right now there is very limited options for the goalie. Since energy is an extreme key factor in Handball this is something I would like to see asap.

The "change after x played minutes" is almost useless in a real match if you don't know the score. In a training match you might want to use it if you don't care if you win or lose.

A player type such as Defender and Paneltyshooter.

Sorry for bad spelling. Posts it from my mobile.

I think that defense formation should be a mirror image of the offensive. This will avoid errors with line-ups, because the current revision introduces a big fuss and the problem of choice of PV. When You're looking at the match summary You see PV on the CB position at defense. This is most evident at 5-1 and 3-2-1 tactics.

I think it could be useful to make the "copy formation" button (with choise "copy from formation:..." for all formation screens except the "opening formation".

For now, when you want to make different conditions for each half-times for sending the same set of players (bench players) you need to create two (or even more) formations. And if you prefer playing such style permanently, it totaly takes a heap of time.

"Less random, Would be a much smaller gap, maybee around;
Youth Academy (YA)
YA 1. OR 80 -160
YA 2. OR 100-180
YA 3. OR 120-200
YA 4. OR 140-220
YA 5. OR 160-240
YA 6. OR 180-260
YA 7. OR 200-280
YA 8. OR 220-300

This will make YA an secure invesment, not very risky one, that the one with luck get the best youths regardless on level."

This is a good idea. If you invest a lot of money in YA and staff you should know what you get. Quality of the players stil remains a luck factor.
I havent seen one legged player offered to Barcelona's academy
Why dont we play whole game on luck and give a 15M GS to a 250 OTR team and say more luck next time.

Maybe some LIVE score reports when watching CL and WCW games would be as Nice as championship games...adds some thrill

I would like to see the average OR of the best 7 players, not 14. Many clubs haven't got so many players and you can play with 7 players. Imho it's more interesting to see the average OR of the best 7.

Well...within a couple of seasons nobody would be able to play with only 7 players?

They wont change such statistic for 2-3 seasons only...

Why not? It depends on the manager if he plays with 7 or up to 14 players. But the same for football and there is also just the first team (11 players).

Ok if you say so

Since defence and offence needs different attributes trained you will see less teams with only 7 players. The players pulled today can play both in many cases. In acouple of seasons you will see less teams playing only 7 players since more players will be trained specifically for defence OR offence.