主題: Questions & Answers

I'm in... Although I may make it up to II.3, but I'm up against some stiff competition.

a créé sa propre image sur la glace et poser sa question, si je me mets dans un autre temps, comme les nationaux, je peux me mis alors à nouveau le dos?

created his own picture on the ice and put his question, if I put myself in another time, such as national, I can myself then again put your back?

Prime example that universal online translators are not reliable.

I wish people wouldn't post the same question in multiple threads either. All of us that follow the Q&A threads follow all the english speaking ones, no need to post it more than once.

More than likely when you do you get conflicting answers because the discussion isn't streamlined.

Just be careful nsblues, he may put himself again in your back!

don't play a guy unless he's less than 3 days away. Nobody has said how much it influences his play, however, the consensus is 1 day: 90% performance, 2 days around 80%, 3 days could be around 70% etc. Moreover, you risk a guy injuring himself again if he's not 100% ready to play. I never use that option.

Well, it seems that this guy :
G1 Marians Delveris 60 21 5 16 76.19% => notation: 9

is not better than this guy :
G1 David Sandwith 65 26 4 22 84.62% => notation: 7
(same opponent, same tactics)

But be aware that the second guy is a defensman, when the first one is a goalie....
Here their caracteristics :

Marians Delveris G1 16 35 5/6 41G 13D 17O 7S 11P 16T 14A 0XP 119 L
David Sandwith G2 18 60 4/6 16G 48D 14O 30S 30P 30T 26A 18XP 194 U

So i have to understand because my defensemen got better pass and tech, he's almost better than an actual goalie ?

These stats were obtained during my last two matches, for the 3rd place playoff game. First one win 4-5ot second lost 5-3....

Someone can help me understanding ?

1. Your sample size is two games. You can not make a judgment, hypothesis, explanation or guess based on two games.

2. both players stink as goalies. based on the 2-1-1 principle a player is only as good as twice his worst secondary. therefore his real value is 22 not 41. The 1 puck for both players shows that

As 'nsblues' said, none of those players is a goalie. The first one looks like a Zamboni driver, the second one could make a living as a skate sharpener.

Uhhh, the first one is a goalie, albeit a poor one, since the secondaries are so skewed.

This only goes to reenforce that you really have to maintain a 2:1:1 ratio AT LEAST with your players.

True dat. Go 41-25-25 with that goalie and watch the ratings fly! Or buy a more decent 60-30-30 goalie with qualities >70 and invest into training facilities and you'll see the difference.

Guys he has a good tender. Darby has been the best in our division this season. He's just "joking" around. LoL

I would actually be super pumped if you could get an canadian or english speaking tourney together. If you want help recruiting I could mail some of my newb friends

The Oil Country Cup has been created (12 teams, 120 credit contribution from me). I'll accept Canadian teams until Sunday, then open it up to the rest of the world. Sign up quick.

is there any max for a team to join? dont want to join if im just gonna get raped