Ämne: Questions & Answers

I just want a national team. Why can't they make a second tier group of national teams with countries at least 20 teams. We'll still play in Rest of the world league but can still have our players represent their country and not miss out on that whole element of this game.

I agree. I say bring some of the smaller leagues back to Other World and then add a few more tiers to the National Team system. I say that any team that can field a roster and has a volunteer to run the team should get a spot in a tournament.

This isn't a "it's too difficult to implement" kind of problem. This is a "it doesn't benefit enough people" problem.

They might not think it will benefit enough, but it definitely will keep managers involved longer, maybe to build up enough to make the countries sustainable... there is a basic number of managers you need to establish and grow, the the leagues takes off, forums get more fun, friendships established, and generally the country starts to be self-sustainable.

Not holding my breath, but would be a great. I'll donate to the cause, how many credits do you need to make it happen Vlady?

it's not about credits. National teams must be sustainable. There must be enough strong candidates to run them. In countries where the number of managers is so small, this is often a problem. Maybe there are people who would do it now, but there is always a risk that there won't be a candidate in such countries.

You can help things by promoting the game in Australia to get your own league.

The solution to a problem with your game should not be for us to do your work of promotion.

There are lots of things that make the game more fun and appealing, and having a national team to cheer for is one of them, but with the current structure, that means creating a new league. We've all seen however that this means fewer quality opponents and limits on advancement.

Why don't we try creating a tournament for other world countries and if criteria aren't met (ie roster set by a certain day, team manager selected, etc) they don't get an entry into the tournament. Ireland and Estonia might even want to be a part of that.

Can someone explain me, why the loosing goaltender get the 1 Star selection of this game?

hockey.powerplaymanager.c...

In NHL, a loosing starter will never be a first star, if the winning goaltender had the better gamestats!? in my opinion..

Only a detail, i know..

39sv vs. 18sv. Plus, judging by the shot ratio the losing goaltender had to deal with better scoring changes not just more shots.

I think reason i, number of shots/saves made. 100% of 7/7 isn't better than 96% 48/50, wouldn't you agree?

Jup i agree with 7 Shots.. but.. With this gamestats, is that realistic?

My Starter had 18/19 shots. And this is not bad too.. In real icehockey, with this gamestats, the loosing goaltender will never be selected as an first star.. agree?

I have one player in market. Chat shows that there is 2 message, but when i open it, there is only one message? Weird

What is the injury algorithm? Why is it that I always have one player injured?
For as long as I've played this game (years) I don't think I've ever gone 3 days without having a player injured.

As soon as one comes back from injury, another gets injured within the next couple of days.

i recommend to buy a better medical staff... i have one injury about 10 days...

Hi,
My guess (I played the game long enough before I started again):

Your medical facility si almost the "lowest" one, get it higher/better.
Buy even better staff to fit your facility level
Train slightly better the first attribute (but keep it close enough not to overpay the salary)

Eventually the more players you have on your Roster the greater chance you have to get a player injured.

Some people with 50-70 players get 2-3 injuries at once...

Hope this will help a little

Vlady - what im sure you realise by now is that getting your own league when you only have 50 teams is not overly good for competition and thus fun.

Lots of nonames is or is not fun?