Наслов: Questions & Answers

im quite strong but 7k loss in a lot even for me. i checked and 1 of strongest latvian teams aswell suffered 7k loss in attendace becouse of very low importance. this money loss is only reason why im now wondering these schemes i wouldnt care more or less for 1 or 2 loses if im in PO games with so much higher energy than my oponent

It's huge for you because you have 70 players.... Stronger teams make huge ammount of money. And I'm not talking about 1 or 2 losses. The top teams in the leagues can win 80 to 90% of their matches playing in VL against a team let's say 20% to 30% weaker in ratings playing in VH. How can we compete with that?

Yes, but while they may win 80% of their matches on VL, they're also going to suffer major attendance losses - which will result in the weaker teams gaining financially (over time). In this game, much like real life, money DOES by success.

and you want to tell me that 80% win isnt success?

The only thing that perhaps changes will be that those teams play games which could end up in a loss on normal and not on low or vl. So in the end the weaker teams will even lose more than before.

Of course it is, but overtime the weaker teams theoretically get stronger which should close the giant gap between big teams and the smaller ones.

If teams want to take a hit to attendance they're more than welcome to pay on vl. If most NHL teams played like they didn't care they would see a dip in fans. That's life.

im not sure how attendace loss will close gap between teams... only in that case if they would reconsider how media sponsor gives money - not from arena size but from home attendance

that could be a good suggestion : After all, Media are interrested in "how may people they could impact", empty seats doesn't matter for them !

and 1 more thing to add. why in a hell i had same 7k attendance loss like with full extras on arena (max tablo, max ice etc) than team who dont have that max? do that was just waste of money and they dont improve anything on attendance?

atm this whole thing with attendance is damn wrong and idea which could be real nice has been made exactly same to everyone. ofc, small teams would tell that would be advantage to big teams but i spent money on these things like tablo so why these doesnt work?

they do work, but only up to your arena's capacity. and the penalty is applied after that.

If you think you will lose you can always play your rookies on N. Save energy for your good players and no risk for attendance penalty!

All opinions are appreciated,

Since a lot of managers already have Facilities in hockey maxed I was hoping you could all give me some good advice/insight. If you look at my Facilities for my hockey team......what would you do and why.

Option #1: Upgrade Training facilities to LvL 14 for 91.5mil?

Option #2: Upgrade Sports Academy to LvL 13 and Human Resources to LvL 12 for 91.5mil?

Option #3: Upgrade 1st line and make my team stronger?

Any advice or explanations on what I should do and why would be greatly appreciated. I have been saving up this money for awhile now and just want to help my team in the right direction going forward the best that I can.

Thanks

P.S. If you have any other advice or suggestions for my team when you are having a look at it......please feel free to suggest other info/stuff to me too. The more information and insight I get the better. Thanks again.

My advice wasn't good enough eh?

Neither 1, 2, or 3. Invest in your arena. i.e. more seats