Tid:
Logg ut
Tema: Suggestions| Velg et land: |
|
Internasjonal |
There is no reasoning with you.
No, no there isn't.
If you give chem for practices, what is the point of chem?
It shouldn't just be there, it should have to be worked for.
If you give chem for practices, what is the point of chem?
It shouldn't just be there, it should have to be worked for.
Infact, we should consider ourselves lucky that chem is only based on playing, not actually based on lines.
If you want realism, then chemistry should drop to 0, or 50, everytime a player on a line is changed.
If you want realism, then chemistry should drop to 0, or 50, everytime a player on a line is changed.
If we want realism we could change thousand of things. It would be complicated for new managers and therefore we lose people who would like the game.
I don't see a problem on having 25% tops for chemistry via practice.
I don't see a problem on having 25% tops for chemistry via practice.
So your argument is that practices should give chemistry for realism, yet you say realism would ruin the game... contradiction?
take it easy guys, you both have your opinion. there is no reason to continue this discussion.
Well, the original suggestion was to give players chemistry for being on a Training CAMP together, i don't know where this idea became normal practice all of a sudden.
well, in football we get chemistry for daily training (till some point)
it would be nice and logical!!!! to have the same in hockey
agree for trainingcamp as well
it would be nice and logical!!!! to have the same in hockey
agree for trainingcamp as well
that's what I say, but he's the Lord of Truth and we should not disagree with him. So...
Someone disagrees with you so then they're "Lord of the Truth"?
I could say the same about you.
Way to represent PPM and Venezuela as their captain...
I could say the same about you.
Way to represent PPM and Venezuela as their captain...
We do have that already, bro, a given player raises his chem even without playing, until 30%. Slow pace though. But I really like the way chem works right now (football).
I don't say I own the truth, I just give my proposal, you're the one making a deal about it.
we have the same thing in hockey ? I don't think so, my players don't have such high chemistry you know ...
Favorittrådene dine
Nyeste innlegg
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Alle rettigheter reservert
Kontakt - Vilkår for bruk - Sikkerhets innstillinger - Cookies settings - Sideoversikt
Reklamere på PowerPlay Manager - Bli vår partner!
Partnere: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 140ms / php: 86ms / db: 54ms ]
Web server: WB1
Kontakt - Vilkår for bruk - Sikkerhets innstillinger - Cookies settings - Sideoversikt
Reklamere på PowerPlay Manager - Bli vår partner!
Partnere: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 140ms / php: 86ms / db: 54ms ]
Web server: WB1