Tema: US U17 National Team

Yes, but it actually seems that not much is carried over. According to the guide, players are automatically dismissed once they become too old for the U17 or U19 team. The chemistry of players that are dismissed by any means is reduced TO 20% (I had thought before it was BY 20%) and carried over to the next age category. I'll see if I can get confirmation on this from the U20 manager in hockey. You may or may not want to keep using key players that you and skizwald identify for that much chemistry.

It's not really impossible that the United States could get lucky/healthy, but it's something that could be done to benefit from a seemingly bad season. Even so, it's something that may be generally useful to do during the first season. In hockey, when I use a 17 year old as a starter (for the U18 team), that player will have 100% chemistry the next season, so I can use 17 year olds during the exhibitions, and it continues to carry over to future seasons (though the effect does diminish over time, maybe ~3 seasons).

It partly depends on the best players from each position being on the team - you might find better players, or players that were good at the beginning of this season might suddenly be trained really poorly or get sold to a team with no facilities. Even so, I suppose a backup with 100% chemistry would still be useful, and a weaker player with 100% chemistry might be more effective as of next season than an otherwise stronger player.

I'd say that 100% chemistry modifies a player's abilities by at least 110%, maybe a little more.

All 15 players that are called up to the national team get a training bonus of about .3 for every game that they are called up for. With that in mind, I still call up the 18 year olds with 100% chemistry in hockey for exhibitions to stay on the bench when I am substituting a 17 year old in for them. Even if you don't develop (for instance) Steiner's chemistry, it might be worth having him as the 13th player or something.

I believe that chemistry is also decreased for all players by up to 30 each season, at least for the senior team. I'm not sure if it will apply to the youth teams.

I think it was less than 30 for players with less than 100 chemistry, so it might have been by a factor of .7 or so. I don't know if this rule would combine with or be replaced by the 20% rule.

Ok, ty.
I'll probably end up trying to work 16 year olds into shape for next season like you suggested.

criteria for the shrimps in U17 are...?

At this point U17 is playing primarily 16 year olds. Given their age, they are not fully grown.

Potential candidates in next season. Extended list

rghost.net/7s5GXvwnm

I think that's the list for the russian national team.

List for american team.I think, it will be useful for the next manager

Found it now.
Thank you.

SF Buster Burchfield
i.imgur.com/S1Z9w5q.png

Man.. that guy looks familiar..

WOOOHOOO!
Beat Bosnia, beat Slovenia!
We've got a great shot at the playoff round.

That Slovenia game!Dang!

Congrats and good luck in the playoffs!

Thank you.

It's been a great season for USA U17.
I think we've already outperformed expectations by far.
I hope we can keep rolling next season.