Pasirinkite šalį: | Tarptautinis |
Indeed, but when you take into account all the other teams, these 2 teams are not all that far apart in strength.
You also forget that the whole puck thing is misleading and not a true representation of how good a team played. From what i've seen over the course of this game, those pucks mean very little when it comes to winning games. Sure, if there was 100 pucks difference, then i'd say they are way different, but the fact is, they're not. 21 pucks, considering how many a team CAN have, is nothing. It's like comparing the Red Wings to the Penguins and saying one is hugely different to the other.
You also forget that the whole puck thing is misleading and not a true representation of how good a team played. From what i've seen over the course of this game, those pucks mean very little when it comes to winning games. Sure, if there was 100 pucks difference, then i'd say they are way different, but the fact is, they're not. 21 pucks, considering how many a team CAN have, is nothing. It's like comparing the Red Wings to the Penguins and saying one is hugely different to the other.
lol not again.
Pucks mean nothing. They're misleading and most the time don't even represent the true quality of the lines.
Pucks mean nothing. They're misleading and most the time don't even represent the true quality of the lines.
The game engine is a joke, it has nothing to do with pucks, team strenght,... Its just luck. So you're right if you say pucks are misleading
I wanted just to show something which I noticed before also: it appears when a club has sent best players to camp, team has almost the same strength in next games as if best players are there.
I know Vlady told me that there is no form within a club, but clubs which are in the very top of the table seem to manage their good form even if they play with wrong tactic. And of course there is a combination of high place on the table & sent players when a club continues with his "form" and wins games which shouldn't be won.
Or maybe that just enters this random zone of unbelievable lost games, and there is no reasonable explanation for this I've noticed.
I know Vlady told me that there is no form within a club, but clubs which are in the very top of the table seem to manage their good form even if they play with wrong tactic. And of course there is a combination of high place on the table & sent players when a club continues with his "form" and wins games which shouldn't be won.
Or maybe that just enters this random zone of unbelievable lost games, and there is no reasonable explanation for this I've noticed.
you are so right on that. It's a joke, absolute joke, worse than my own variety of corny jokes even!
waaaaaaa
waaaaaaa
I think i might just jump on the "game engine sucks" bandwagon. Although, I wouldn't say it sucks... but it does need a good looking at.
Hell, didn't you know the game favours those at the top of the big leagues in virtually every single way possible!!!
Just for the same of argument... here are the team profiles of my team and the guy who right now is somehow beating me.
http://hockey.powerplaymanager .com/en/team.html?data=26254-b risbane-stars
http://hockey.powerplaymanager .com/en/team.html?data=26481-n -stars
I ask you... WTF???
Don't say it's random... because that is not a good enough excuse.
http://hockey.powerplaymanager .com/en/team.html?data=26254-b risbane-stars
http://hockey.powerplaymanager .com/en/team.html?data=26481-n -stars
I ask you... WTF???
Don't say it's random... because that is not a good enough excuse.
I guess this means the rules have changed:
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
there is no wheel of tactics anymore.
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
there is no wheel of tactics anymore.
Tavo mėgstamiausios temos
Naujausi pranešimai