国名を選択して下さい: | インターナショナル |
there are no defensive statistics that we could give them an award for. they do get prizes for all star team
But nevertheless. Developers are ready to go for removal of a pulling from 13, 14, 15 weeks, for the sake of increase in good players in the first draft? When in the pool will appear 8-10 A-players, opinion of many managers can be change.
And is it possible to make a system in which managers could agree or refuse to draft? Voting with the possibility to change your choice before the the date of revealing the list of players to the Draft. Already based on the the number of people who have agreed, create a list. If these people less than 10, then the draft is canceled or performed by the current path. Something like this. Of course it is necessary to think more carefully.
Sorry for my English, I hope my suggestions are clear.
And is it possible to make a system in which managers could agree or refuse to draft? Voting with the possibility to change your choice before the the date of revealing the list of players to the Draft. Already based on the the number of people who have agreed, create a list. If these people less than 10, then the draft is canceled or performed by the current path. Something like this. Of course it is necessary to think more carefully.
Sorry for my English, I hope my suggestions are clear.
Personally, i'm tired of watching every week this: i.imgur.com/UKbepxV.png
When the Academy 15 and Youth training Efficiency: 100%
When the Academy 15 and Youth training Efficiency: 100%
blocked shots, successful tackles, intercepted passes (i.e. breaking the opposition attack),... you just have to implement those kind of "plays"
Saying "there are no defensive statistics that we could give them an award for" doesnt do the trick.
"they do get prizes for all star team"
as do GK, M and F... and how does that show on bank account?
Saying "there are no defensive statistics that we could give them an award for" doesnt do the trick.
"they do get prizes for all star team"
as do GK, M and F... and how does that show on bank account?
At creation, duplication and editing of the substitution - the page scrolled to the editing block.
i.imgur.com/D5ifhsg.png
Manually scrolling is very uncomfortable, especially if you have created a lot of substitutions.
i.imgur.com/D5ifhsg.png
Manually scrolling is very uncomfortable, especially if you have created a lot of substitutions.
+1
I already suggested this soon after the new substitutions where implemented, but the idea was ignored on this forum and on Slovenian forum people thought that this doesn't matter, because most managers don't set a lot of substitutions. I used to set about 100 susbstitutions or so, now I don't anymore because it would take way too much time scrolling down.
I already suggested this soon after the new substitutions where implemented, but the idea was ignored on this forum and on Slovenian forum people thought that this doesn't matter, because most managers don't set a lot of substitutions. I used to set about 100 susbstitutions or so, now I don't anymore because it would take way too much time scrolling down.
I guess blocked shots on goal would do. But I don't realy care about statistics rewards because it's not a lot of money. But if it was implemented, there would be more realistic shot on goal statistics also.
Now only when goalkeeper blocks a shot on goal it count's as a shot in the shooters statistics. When any other player blocks a shot, it doesn't coun't as a shot. Eventhough in fact there was a shot and block of any defender that saves goal is just as important as if the keeper saved it. So why not give players that block shots the credit for it.
But I'm afraid it would require a major rework of the GE, so I kind of doubt it will happen.
Now only when goalkeeper blocks a shot on goal it count's as a shot in the shooters statistics. When any other player blocks a shot, it doesn't coun't as a shot. Eventhough in fact there was a shot and block of any defender that saves goal is just as important as if the keeper saved it. So why not give players that block shots the credit for it.
But I'm afraid it would require a major rework of the GE, so I kind of doubt it will happen.
I think it's not so difficult to implement technically. It would be a small but nice improvement.
I'm sure it's not. I think the problem is the page has to reload to display the new substitution. And when page is reloaded it auto-scrolls to the top by default. They'd just have to make the page scroll to the right position after the auto-reload.
My addition to the suggestion the last time was also to automatically edit the copied susbstitution, so we don't have to click the edit button. It's obvious that we want to edit the copied substitution, so there's realy no need for the extra button click.
My addition to the suggestion the last time was also to automatically edit the copied susbstitution, so we don't have to click the edit button. It's obvious that we want to edit the copied substitution, so there's realy no need for the extra button click.
On the page "Draft" it was implemented. You clicked on the player, page has been updated and further scrolling occured in the player's position.
This is just small thing, but could Season bonuses be sorted by oldest on top. Now it's by default sorted by age with the youngest on top.
I understand that commercial tournaments is your profit. But cancel friendlies in day of game is overkill. Can you at least a day before the tournament starts assign matches to Calendar? I ask only about one day to search for opponent.
Cancel rule "-30%" (chemistry at the beginning of each season is reduced to 70%) for youth NTs (U-17, U-20).
This rule was primarily introduced for the first NTs. Because their roster of players participating in matches is rarely changed.
In practice, in youth NTs (if one is fortunate) play two generations of players (senior and middle, sometimes only the senior). Therefore roster youth teams almost completely renewed every two seasons and each season renewed by half.
Under these conditions, the reduction of chemistry is not required because it not so often reaches values of 60-80%, not to mention the 100%.
This rule was primarily introduced for the first NTs. Because their roster of players participating in matches is rarely changed.
In practice, in youth NTs (if one is fortunate) play two generations of players (senior and middle, sometimes only the senior). Therefore roster youth teams almost completely renewed every two seasons and each season renewed by half.
Under these conditions, the reduction of chemistry is not required because it not so often reaches values of 60-80%, not to mention the 100%.
お気に入りのスレッド
最新の投稿