Aika:
Kirjaudu ulos
Aihe: Questions & Answers| Valitse maa: |
|
Kansainvälinen |
Maybe there are any calculations how much marginal level of maintenance center decrease maintenance costs? I know some guys have calculated how much chemistry and experience effects player's performance so maybe someone calculated this as well?
The % reduction of arena daily expenses = maintenance facility level * (2 + security service efficiency)
Likewise, the % reduction of facility daily expenses = maintenance facility level * (2 + maintenance efficiency)
Likewise, the % reduction of facility daily expenses = maintenance facility level * (2 + maintenance efficiency)
So if I understood correctly, if I have 8 level maintenance center and 80% maintenance efficiency, then reduction of facility daily expenses will be 8*(2+0,8)=22.4% ??
How much line up have to be weakened in finals to make it reduced sponsors offers? And if I send my key players to training camp before the finals, will it affect sponsors offers as well or not?
Is there anywhere(forum) where i can ask for some kind of players? Like looking for particular player and offering that much money for that kind of player?
Have anyone find out which zone defense is in this game? Is it 2-3 zone or 3-2 or there is no difference here.
great question and i don't know. but try it out against different teams to see when it does well and when it doesn't and go from there
Under my experience zone defense isn't that good against close range shots so it might be 3-2 zone. It would be nice to have other opinions regarding this.
opposit opinion from me. 3-2 zone and bad against 3 pointers, good against close shots.
Then something is wrong with me 
Thank you.
Thank you.
i think that with close range shots there is a bigger chance of either winning/losing the quarter by a bigger amount. i have found i will win a quarter by over ten points, then lose another later in the game by over ten points. With balanced shooting the scores seem to be closer.
if i had to choose one zone defence for a match engine it would be a 3-2 zone (3 inside, 2 outside) which is better against close shots than 3 pointers
if i had to choose one zone defence for a match engine it would be a 3-2 zone (3 inside, 2 outside) which is better against close shots than 3 pointers
Suosikkiaiheesi
Uusimmat viestit
Copyright © 2007-2024 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Kaikki oikeudet pidätetään
Yhteystiedot - Käyttöehdot - Yksityisyydensuoja - Cookies settings - Sivustokartta
Mainostaminen PowerPlay Managerissa - Ryhdy kumppaniksi!
Yhteistyökumppanit: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com
[all: 129ms / php: 107ms / db: 22ms ]
Web server: WB1
Yhteystiedot - Käyttöehdot - Yksityisyydensuoja - Cookies settings - Sivustokartta
Mainostaminen PowerPlay Managerissa - Ryhdy kumppaniksi!
Yhteistyökumppanit: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com
[all: 129ms / php: 107ms / db: 22ms ]
Web server: WB1