Emnet: Questions & Answers

Why is the game unfair in sponsor income ?

What are you as a company PPM earn on the very very big differences ?

We don't think it's unfair. There are some advantages that go with playing in a smaller country and there are some counterweights for that.

That second question is very strange and doesn't make much sense. Very very big differences? I think that's a very very big exaggeration. Like I said, the system was designed the ensure fair competition whether you believe it or not. Perhaps it is not perfect, but it's the best we could do at that time.

I still think sponsors should be linked with each league strenght, not with number of divisions a country has. Don't you agree that would be fairer?

Nice income the managers will have in lowest divisions full of inactive team nonames so very low strength divisons. You have to look at both sides.

Well they could set to ignore team nonames, calculate only active teams for sponsorship.

average teams strenghth of ACTIVE teams - problem solved

@HIGUERA: I agree.

I totally after with that too!

i agree, superb ,idea, its fair for evryone

Basically it's a good idea but there are still very important flaws with it:

1. Energy plays a major role on team strength. Leagues could agree to play very low for the whole season to maximize sponsor income.

2. Many teams play their youngsters when they see it'll not harm their result. It wouldn't be fair to punish them for it.

3. Team strengths are rising season after season which would lead to ever increasing sponsor money and inflation.

4. You can cheat the team strength by changing formation which very often doesn't make your team play better.

5. That would provide very high sponsors for teams who play only against bots. Fair?


In my opinion average overall team rating of all teams would be a much better meter because it excludes all those flaws and is actually a pretty good meter to tell how good the league is.

I agree with you!

You have wrong.... its all I can say ! And its never going to be better...

Swedish teams could not have youngsters... so big fail

I agree 100% with your last paragraph.

That's what I meant: Average overall rating (Best 12 players, for basketball; best 11 players, for football), bots included...

Sponsor offers could come the first 3 days of every new season, in order to avoid what you say in point 1.

Or just take energi, as an element, out of the equation - as the home team advantage is taken out of the game equation for the cup's. Simpel count the 11 strongest accordingly as they Will Appear on the lineup if you dont make one yourself.
Just country the OR is not fair in that since since if the league have a dead team, they more ir less drop 5% straight of. And the total OR every season is more or less the same to share. It's only if you've a team qualifing for a cup, that the league Will get extra OR.

This game stinks