Emnet: Suggestions

remove the relegation lines in the lowest leagues, because there is no relegation there. Or just add a note saying that it is the lowest league, so relegation does not apply untill new leagues are created below it....

this would be realistic, not like it is now, funny all players have birthday on the same day!

it is simpler with the CL system.

So my idea, it is not a small idea, because when you change something, it leaves an impact on the other things, so the changes are several things at once!
1st For implementing this idea, it would require to cut off money for many teams, this is because in order to avoid a situation where in one team plays 30 Wayne Gretzky, while another can not hir one Arnason! Just if cut off the III league teams sponsors that receive as much as I lower teams of the league, well then cut of ir for all those who are outside this table!
2nd Need to create a table of contract by the league! The idea is(ofcourse these numbers can change)-

V League receives contract 1-3M per week
IV 2.5-6M
III, 5-9M
II 8-12M
I 11-16M

2nd Then need to create a certain table, which states how big sponsorship will receive the V Leagues 1st, 2nd, 3rd place from the higher sponsorship for 1st place and ending with the smallest contract for last place, it will make-league where you play and the place you get, the main thing in calculating the sponsors!

Next, here follows a variety of bonuses-
1.KR winding up at the sponsor's calculation, but not the entire liquidation.
2nd KR appropriate for the league
V for victory in the League receives a KR point
IV -1.5
III-2
II-2, 5
I-3 points, it should also be realistic that the top league receives mor KR points, all the KR will be important only for NC. Just for NC lottery!

3rd certainly it will make a situation that few will have the same number of points, I propose the following solution-
If I League team wins 1st league place, then with those three points KR, there is extra 0.02 KR points, respectively, for each lower place 0,001 KR point less!
Of course, these figures may be increased not to have so many numbers after the decimal, but it's the idea!
After all it will be that I League teams will be sparse above and II and other league teams below!

I hope that you understand the idea!

4th speaking of bonuses, National Cup would be the second most important NK bonus, such as the club passes 1st stage of NC, at his sponsor's contract comes accompanied for example 2% of the club sponsorship the 2nd round gives 2.5% and so on. (Maybe this is used now, but we do not really see it) And it would be fair, because in reality it is possible that a Birmingham City take the FA Cup, when they beat Arsenal at the final, why should not they be awarded with the biggest bonus % for general sponsorship?

5th then as a final bonus must be Economics department + employees! But their influence, I still could not figure out!


All this I advice, because, there are so many managers, who are not satisfied with that some teams ar far far away from others, and that some teams in III leagu gets more money than I leage last place team! I think that this idea would be fair for all, because, it would stimulate to fight for advancing a league, as well as fighting for place in league, because every higher place will give more and more money!

Friends what do you say about this idea? maybe if this idea will get some support, it could be realised?

I don't think we need to do something as drastic as to "cut money" from teams. I've seen that happen before and it was anything but pretty. The devs have made changes at the beginning of this hockey season to encourage promotion to higher leagues by Increasing stadium revenue and such.

However, I really like your idea of giving bonuses out for NC success, especially for teams that are not at that highest level in country and have little to fight over in their league, there is some help you get through OTR gains from the Cup which may be worth more than you'd think.

oh, and check this forum out too: ppm.powerplaymanager.com/...

how do you think is this fair, that two or three teams in ppm gets almost 50M per week and other I leagu teams gets 10M per week, it will make those three teams unachievable for anybody! these teams will be far far away from others, and I think it really not fair, because these teams built their reputation playing in leagu, where they are almost twice as better then other teams, they are simply out of competition!

50mil is a bit outrageous... i would be suprised if anyone got this!

brazilian man have 50 Mio..
Ima not sure, but i heard from somebody, who has talked with him!

probably lithuanian boob army gets smth like that

I find that hard to believe. $50mil per season maybe, but not per week.

50Mil per week in hockey, not football!

I still find that incredibly hard to believe. Then again, i make $18mil and i'm the 3rd - 6th best team in OW Div 1, which is a LOT weaker than many top leagues.

and now please imagine, how you can catch those teams with budget 50M per week, that is impossible, and I think it is really unfair!

If you're as good as you think you are, your budget and profits will grow faster than theirs and you will eventually come closer. If you're no so good, you have no right to catch them. And this is a long term game.