Tid:
Log ud
Emnet: National team Q&A
Here is a question for you all. Who makes a better center and why?
Player 1: 150ATT 70PA 50TC
Player 2: 100ATT 70PA 50TC
| Vælg et land: |
|
Canada |
They both are equal in the eyes of the game engine.
I know alot of people will pick #1 but isn't this the best example of 2-1-1 and 4-3-2? As a center will #1 be a better passer than #2?
so you mean, which is better between these 2?
4-2-1
1) 200 ATT 100 PA 50 Tech 100 other skills
2-1-1
2) 200 ATT 100 PA 100 Tech 50 other skills
4-2-1
1) 200 ATT 100 PA 50 Tech 100 other skills
2-1-1
2) 200 ATT 100 PA 100 Tech 50 other skills
No, they are assumed to be equal by us. Vlady said that more is always better, although I'm sure that the effect isn't much greater.
I agree with Canucks,
I think they are the same.. I think Vlady said there is no penalty on the secondaries if you are over the ratio.
So,
Player 1: 150ATT 70PA 50TC
Player 2: 100ATT 75PA 50TC
Notice I made Player 2 have 75 Passing...
I think he would be better, but only a tiny bit because secondaries don't count for as much as the primary (guide says so).
To be clear, I think if the first guy had 75 and the second 70 he would be better then.
I think they are the same.. I think Vlady said there is no penalty on the secondaries if you are over the ratio.
So,
Player 1: 150ATT 70PA 50TC
Player 2: 100ATT 75PA 50TC
Notice I made Player 2 have 75 Passing...
I think he would be better, but only a tiny bit because secondaries don't count for as much as the primary (guide says so).
To be clear, I think if the first guy had 75 and the second 70 he would be better then.
The same??? ok i will open a thread on this.
but that situation is different than the first one.
In the first one both secondaries were equal, but one had a higher primary.
In the first one both secondaries were equal, but one had a higher primary.
I know....
I was making an alternate situation.
For the first situation, I agree with Canucks, the game engine will reward your team with the same number of stars for either player.
In MY situation, I wanted to relate some extra information. What I was saying was the primary is penalized based on the lowest secondary. HOWEVER, extra secondaries are still rewarded to the player if there was some... hence I said, if one were to have 75 passing, that guy would be a bit better (but only by a small margin).
I was making an alternate situation.
For the first situation, I agree with Canucks, the game engine will reward your team with the same number of stars for either player.
In MY situation, I wanted to relate some extra information. What I was saying was the primary is penalized based on the lowest secondary. HOWEVER, extra secondaries are still rewarded to the player if there was some... hence I said, if one were to have 75 passing, that guy would be a bit better (but only by a small margin).
How's the player search coming? Any front runners from the players that have been submitted? What kind of player builds are you looking at?
They will probably pick players that are on teams the have won in the past.
Dine favorittråde
Nyeste poster
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Alle rettigheder forbeholdes
Kontakt - Forretningsbetingelser - Privacy policy - Cookies settings - Portal kort
Reklamer på PowerPlay Manager - Bliv vores partner!
Partnere: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 154ms / php: 105ms / db: 49ms ]
Web server: WB1
Kontakt - Forretningsbetingelser - Privacy policy - Cookies settings - Portal kort
Reklamer på PowerPlay Manager - Bliv vores partner!
Partnere: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 154ms / php: 105ms / db: 49ms ]
Web server: WB1