Odaberi državu: | SAD |
maybe save, reset, reload should be a pro-pack option
I'm not upset about loosing a game, I have plenty of lost games (4 in fact) ... I just want to understand why I lost, in order to make proper adjustments for my team.
3.I don't think that, at this stage, the difference between low and normal is so high, especially when my players have above 99 energy..
4.Yes, maybe u r right...but ...any ideea why I have won less face-offs than him ? I have 2 centers with 75/45/45 and 2 with 90/55/55..
4.Yes, maybe u r right...but ...any ideea why I have won less face-offs than him ? I have 2 centers with 75/45/45 and 2 with 90/55/55..
faceoffs to me seem to still be a bit of a mystery. I consistently lost more than 1/2 and I think my C's have pretty good T overall...
a general rule of thumb I use is that low to normal (and normal to high) buys you about 6 points to your team rating.
a general rule of thumb I use is that low to normal (and normal to high) buys you about 6 points to your team rating.
It just doesn't make sense to me to ask "Why did I lose". The Chicago Blackhawks (currently 1st) lost to the Panthers (Currently 27th)
Why? Well, maybe it was because it was the first game. Maybe it was because they were in Finland. maybe it was just because of the shootout. Maybe it was because Huet had a horrible start to the season.
I realize that in a sense this is not the NHL and at it's core is just a bunch of number crunching, but that's not fun. Hockey is what we are emulating, not a statistics competition. There will always be puzzling losses, and that is what makes it fun.
Why? Well, maybe it was because it was the first game. Maybe it was because they were in Finland. maybe it was just because of the shootout. Maybe it was because Huet had a horrible start to the season.
I realize that in a sense this is not the NHL and at it's core is just a bunch of number crunching, but that's not fun. Hockey is what we are emulating, not a statistics competition. There will always be puzzling losses, and that is what makes it fun.
Six team strength points? Wow, that difference really stretches as your team improves then. My differential is only 1 or 2 in each category.
Not yet, but it would be great if they could bring them in.
Disclaimer:
The provider of this advice is ranked behind a NoName team at the half-way mark of the season.
The provider of this advice is ranked behind a NoName team at the half-way mark of the season.
A noname team that folded only 2 days ago.... As IRL GK can make or break a team.
Fair enough, Eeoulo, I'll rephrase:
The provider of this advice is ranked behind a NoName team at the half-way mark of the season,
... additionally has one coach (who has an 18 OR), no lecturers, five physicians (none better than 29), one sporting director (a 17 OR), a 700 seat arena with a Large Stand-Up (with no press box), and 51 players on the roster.
The provider of this advice is ranked behind a NoName team at the half-way mark of the season,
... additionally has one coach (who has an 18 OR), no lecturers, five physicians (none better than 29), one sporting director (a 17 OR), a 700 seat arena with a Large Stand-Up (with no press box), and 51 players on the roster.
underneath you see 5 special tags (when you want to post a message), click on the 4th icon (from the left)
then you see [ hockey_player=id ], replace the id with the playerid (open player, on top you see id)
then you see [ hockey_player=id ], replace the id with the playerid (open player, on top you see id)
Tvoje omiljene teme
Novi postovi