الوقت:
تسجيل خروج
العنوان: PPMe: Suggestions and Fixes| اختر دولة: |
|
الدولية |
It'll have A LOT of work done on it tomorrow as Mr. Orange and my schedules lighten up. Also, I no longer will be bugging him about my "PPM Alerts" project which is entering the final testing phase.
You guys are awesome! To be able to program this kind of stuff is really something. Many years ago I thought I did great when I programmed my VCR!
That's all him. I'm simply the slave driver. My "PPM Alerts" is peanuts compared to PPMe. Honestly, Mr. Orange is a coding genius.
Haha, it's not that difficult. Anyways, I am making progress. Just finished the Market refresh button. By the way, has anyone noticed that the market page is painfully slow lately? I think those self made countdown timers from PPM are a serious performance issue.
I am also thinking of creating a way to let people who have hit the 500 friends limit, remove the friends who are no longer active on PPM. (i.e. people who no longer have a team)
I am also thinking of creating a way to let people who have hit the 500 friends limit, remove the friends who are no longer active on PPM. (i.e. people who no longer have a team)
Alright. Just wrote the remove inactive friends functionality. I'll give it a test run with canucks357's account tonight. See if it works properly.
Sitter function FTW!
Alright. Remove friends functionality is working nicely.
I'd say! Removed 150 from mine and 200 from saint2e's!
Wow, that remove inactive friends function is going make my day!
I've many times went through all my friends in order to remove the inactive ones.
I've many times went through all my friends in order to remove the inactive ones.
Glad someone else will find it useful! I've been in the 498-500 region for a long time and that's why I asked Mr. Orange whether it was doable or not. Not sure how often it'd be used by people but, I suspect, there are others like myself who would want it. And, voila! Your comment proves N>1!!!
Glad his hard work wasn't just for me
Glad his hard work wasn't just for me
It wasn't to begin with. He mentioned he tested it on 1-2 others besides you already. OK, I'm done. Don't hit me!
I'm confused. But whatever you say
Well, this for one. N>1 already existed. Now it's more like N>2. I must be talking in riddles because I know I am NOT the smarter of the two of us.
Ah, there you're wrong! I asked the others to lend their accounts via the sitter function to test it further. It was not built specifically for their use. I.e. someone who would REALLY want to use it exists beyond me only discovered now, hence, N>1. Q.E.D.
What about quantum electrodynamics?
مواضيعك المفضلة
أحدث الردود
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - جميع الحقوق محفوظة
اتصل بنا - شروط تجارية - سند الخصوصية - Cookies settings - خريطة الموقع
الإعلان في باور بلاي مانجر - كن شريكا لنا
الشركاء: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 104ms / php: 67ms / db: 38ms ]
Web server: WB1
اتصل بنا - شروط تجارية - سند الخصوصية - Cookies settings - خريطة الموقع
الإعلان في باور بلاي مانجر - كن شريكا لنا
الشركاء: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 104ms / php: 67ms / db: 38ms ]
Web server: WB1