Asunto: III.2

4 star Goalie or 3.5 star centre with only 5/6 longevity. Look forward to seeing his qualities. Also pulled a 3 star winger, probably won't pan out.

Hey guys, I put up two good D on the market. One a solid NOW guy, universal really good for a playoff push... the other a phenomenal Q'd 6/6 16 year old who can play now and has a massive future ahead of him. To be frank, only reason I'm selling him is due to his shooting. I have lots of weaker shooting guys and want more guys who can play PP as I really only have 2 or 3 that can do that.

garbage pulls

I see beets put a few "tracking" bids on them. I do the same sometimes....

These are the three best players I've pulled from my academy, and all of them have come around this time of the season:

Trevor Duberry Age:18 C/L : 5/6 OR: 449

Goa: 182(96) Pass: 91(84) Tec: 92(73)



Collin Neal Age:17 C/L:6/6 OR: 455

Goa: 18 (80) Def: 30 (83) Off: 137 (89) Sho: 83 (98) Pass: 69 (80) Tech: 68 (99) Agr:50 (70)



Alejandro Holmes Age: 16 C/L: 5/6 OR: 413

Def: 32 (84) Off: 115 (86) Sho: 74 (88) Pass: 60 (83) Tech: 60 (88) Agr: 50 (45)

forgot avqs....

Trevor Duberry AvQ = 80%

Collin Neal - 86 %

Alejandro Holmes = 77%

I'll give 15mil for Neal. Likely more... make it 20

Wow. The prospect is already up to 500k. That's good. BUT... all these people who would place tracking bids and get into a bidding war may not happen. Sometimes the best route to a high sale is all minimum bids

yah, sucks losin out on the tracking bids...


Also, no deal for Collin Neal....

25mil? 32mil?

i just can't do it........ i dont think there is a price that will get that done.

My best pull was a late season pull too. I got a lot of 1/1.5 stars this time.

Ah well, doesn't get much better than Andre Barker

Hmm, I got one semi-decent pull in the lot. A 6/6 winger with 309OR but his overall Q seems low at 61%.

Go 24 35 De 26 74 Of 72 96 Sh 50 99 Pa 41 61 Te 46 77 Ag 50 62
Brendan Martine

I've found this season to be rather poor in real prospects compared to last season or two seasons ago.

academy is something i don`t believe in! I prefer in nice 13 million $ 19 years old guys over 500 Tc with lots of experience then a new comers

Except I have 2 16 year olds at or above 400 OR, both with top xp (for their age), chemistry nearing 100. They both will hit 500 before they're 18.

I have a 466OR 18 yo homegrown dman. Top xp again.

442OR homegrown goalie.

Basically, a good chunk of the core of my team (there are more), all aged under 18 yo, are coming from my schools. The older ones are above 400 at 18, the younger ones are easily above 400 at 17. Yes, I did spend 34 millions to build this. But to get guys like these, I probably would have spent the same amount (or close). Also, those facilities will keep on creating good pulls in the future. That guy I pulled today, 306 OR. If his stats hold up, he'll be 400 at 16, 500 at 17 and probably 650 at 18.

Not too bad, no?

Short term though, your philosophy get you to be #1 in the league while I barely make the playoffs (still to be confirmed). Long term, I'd say that going with the facilities will win out every time.