Tiempo:
Salir
Asunto: Questions & Answers| Selecciona un país: |
|
Internacional |
Has anybody tried 4-2-3-1, wingers and CAM with over 70% on shooting?
I am currently having $12M due to prize money but no facility to upgrade. I was planning to go for a stadium upgrade early next season but I am not sure if I should do it now given that I have the money. If I do it now I'll have 2400 seats less going into media sponsorship. Would it be worth waiting for the sponsor offer or should I go for the upgrade now itself?
I would wait. It's only a few more days.
I disagree. Rating is a indicator only. To judge who is truly the better player you need to look at everything... Attributes, qualities, cl, age, etc.
But the keeper on rate 25 is stronger than the keeper on rate 23 in the next match ! Or....
Rating is the _main_ indicator if we talk about "abilities and overall suitability for the position" but it says nothing about "performance of the player in that match".
Question was initially incomplete - "which is better?". Better for what? For example, energy has already been taken into account in the rating because "rating is the combination of his experience, chemistry, energy and attributes needed for the given position".
But is higher rating ensures better performance in particularly match? Not at all.
Question was initially incomplete - "which is better?". Better for what? For example, energy has already been taken into account in the rating because "rating is the combination of his experience, chemistry, energy and attributes needed for the given position".
But is higher rating ensures better performance in particularly match? Not at all.
Also, keep in mind that for example chemistry (mainly defenders) falls into play in some tactical choices such as off side play. Another thing is that for example defense skill is important for attackers as well but it doesn't show in the rating, or shooting for all filed players.
But since the players
But since the players
*But since the players in question were goalkeepers (they have no influence on other parts of the play except goalkeeping) the one with the higher rating is most likely better.
So true AzGift +1 !!
---
I think managers is on deep water then they say rate not is important.
And ridicoulos to say that a rate 25 not is better than a 23 rate in the goal.
---
SURE
Calle on my street could be better than Manuel Neuer if Neuer have a bad day !!!
Calle rate 4 with a good day and better fortune
Neuer rate 25 with a bad day and 40 years old.
---
Should be nice to see PPM World Cup, if the teams have lower rates and hope to be lucky !! =)
---
I think managers is on deep water then they say rate not is important.
And ridicoulos to say that a rate 25 not is better than a 23 rate in the goal.
---
SURE
Calle on my street could be better than Manuel Neuer if Neuer have a bad day !!!
Calle rate 4 with a good day and better fortune
Neuer rate 25 with a bad day and 40 years old.
---
Should be nice to see PPM World Cup, if the teams have lower rates and hope to be lucky !! =)
I certainly agree. Rating "25" is rating "25" and it higher than "23" no matter what is season energy level. And it is final answer for goalkeepers.
All that rating indicates is that one Goalie was better based on the last game. But "better" to me has to be a long term thing, and rating doesn't include longevity etc.
That`s right, that the questions about player rating may be relevant not only to the match perfomance.
What will be better reinforcement for my team for the next season?
What is the best emergency substitution for my injury keeper during League Cup?
Which of my three keepers i can sold with minimal drop of overall team perfomance?
And correct answer will be different depending on many other parameters of course.
What will be better reinforcement for my team for the next season?
What is the best emergency substitution for my injury keeper during League Cup?
Which of my three keepers i can sold with minimal drop of overall team perfomance?
And correct answer will be different depending on many other parameters of course.
I know what you mean to.
But the question was really simple to answer.
With your thougts you complicate everything more than its have to do.
Its many ways to go for success, and build for the future is one. Another way is... WIN many matches and get OTR and get a economical favours that way.
Later in the game you can have both...
But the question was really simple to answer.
With your thougts you complicate everything more than its have to do.
Its many ways to go for success, and build for the future is one. Another way is... WIN many matches and get OTR and get a economical favours that way.
Later in the game you can have both...
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Todos los derechos reservados
Contacto - Condiciones Generales - Política de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del sitio
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Convertite en nuestro socio!
Socios: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 126ms / php: 78ms / db: 48ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contacto - Condiciones Generales - Política de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del sitio
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Convertite en nuestro socio!
Socios: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 126ms / php: 78ms / db: 48ms ]
Web server: WB1