Tiempo:
Salir
Asunto: Questions & Answers
My goalkeeper will not have a best goalkeeper
| Selecciona un país: |
|
Internacional |
I wonder how do you calculate prize money for goalkeeper statistics. For example in my league there is a goalkeeper on the first place after tonight's update. He played only 11 games and already in table. His stats: he saves team for 179 times, while his team got 2119 shots on goal during the season. So this is only 8%, not 20% as you declare.
My goalkeeper will not have a best goalkeeper
My goalkeeper will not have a best goalkeeper
It's not based on saves. It's total shots against. He has 439 shots against. That's just over 20% of the team'sb 2119.
How many teams get relegated from the relegation round thing? 3?
I have a chance then! XD I have saved some energy so I hope I won't be beaten up too badly. So many games in a season I expect some people have spent energy wildly.
What is the system in case of a draw in the playoff.
2x5min + penalty shootout if no winner after overtime?
2x5min + penalty shootout if no winner after overtime?
2x5min, then 2x5min if necessary and then shootout if necessary
Thanks for checking 
my bad I got confused with hockey system 
Thought it would have been the same...
my bad I got confused with hockey system Thought it would have been the same...
In the playoff, if you play lets say 1 of the finalgames on verylow to save energy for the homegame, or for the qualification game to promote. Does that affect my sponsoroffer negativly? Does the systems consider this as trying to lose and therefor giving less sponsoroffer?
I think that the sponsor would penalize you only if you used a secondary, weaker, formation. The game importance doesn't influence it. But I'm not 100% about that.
this is weird. A secondary formation VH could be better than a primary playing on VL.
team OR should take intensity as consideration. Without it, it is still very possible to "cheat" and intentionally lose a game.
Last season i saw someone doing it by starting full team, playing VL, but with a crap player at goalie and got relegated. The Team OR didnt change much by doing it likely did not affect his sponsor offers.
team OR should take intensity as consideration. Without it, it is still very possible to "cheat" and intentionally lose a game.
Last season i saw someone doing it by starting full team, playing VL, but with a crap player at goalie and got relegated. The Team OR didnt change much by doing it likely did not affect his sponsor offers.
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Todos los derechos reservados
Contacto - Condiciones Generales - Política de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del sitio
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Convertite en nuestro socio!
Socios: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 140ms / php: 95ms / db: 45ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contacto - Condiciones Generales - Política de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del sitio
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Convertite en nuestro socio!
Socios: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 140ms / php: 95ms / db: 45ms ]
Web server: WB2